Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nano Today. 2015 Sep 5;10(4):487–510. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2015.06.006

Table 1.

Features of primary phagocytic receptors responsible for nanoparticle-mediated cellular uptake.

Receptor Type Receptor Subtype Receptor Description
Toll-like Receptors TLR 1,2,4,5,6 Located on surface of phagocytes [105]
TLR 3,7,8, 9 Found within intracellular compartments [105]
TLR 2,3,7 Induce cell survival or inflammatory reducing mechanisms such as autophagy [106, 107]
TLR 4
  • Detects LPS, a common contaminant arising from bacterial adsorption on nanoparticles and is recognized by TLR4 surface receptors and activates inflammasome production [108, 109].

  • Initiates inflammation to remove pathogens [110, 111].

Mannose/Lectin Receptors Recognize complex carbohydrates, detecting mannose, glucose or sugar structures on pathogenic material and glycoproteins [112].
C-type lectin Have been engaged by decorating NP surfaces with di-mannose and galactose [113]
Sugar lectin-mannose Interactions with macrophages can be harnessed with nanoparticulates decorated with large numbers of sugar-like motifs [114, 115]
Mannan Has been used to coat gelatin nanoparticles to increase specificity of delivery of didanosine to macrophages for the treatment of HIV [116].
These nanoparticles substantially increased the amount of drug delivered to the brain, lymphatics and splenic tissue regions, increasing specificity of delivery and decreasing systemic side effects [117].
Mannose (CD206)
  • Targets Th2 polarized macrophages for certain chronic inflammatory disease states [118, 119].

Carbohydrate surface modification
  • Utilized to help direct tumor targeting of mesoporous silica nanomaterials for thermoablative therapy, which reduced tumor size significantly compared to control in treated animals [120].

Scavenger receptors
  • Implicated in non-specific macrophage-nanoparticle uptake [18, 121]

  • Could increase phagocytic recognition and decreased circulation potential.

  • Responsible for the recognition and internalization of foreign pathogens, oxidized or acetylated native proteins (i.e., low density lipoproteins (LDLs) and maleylated albumin) and apoptotic cellular debris [122].

  • Recognition and uptake of NP in macrophages has been linked to inflammation-induced nanoparticle toxicity [18].

  • Play a primary role in the recognition and identification of LPS on gram-negative bacteria and lipoteichoic acid on the surface of gram-positive bacteria (both common contaminants on the surface of nanoparticles) [123].

  • Extensive testing should be performed on NP to ensure surfaces are free of LPS

SR-AI/II scavenger receptors
  • Can be targeted using poly anionic ligands [124].

  • Uptake superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles coated with non-aggregated dextran, a poly anionic sugar (Dextran-SPIO) [87].

    • However, when the particles were coated with a proprietary polymer brush, uptake via these receptors was significantly diminished or eliminated [43, 87, 125].

    • Could be silenced to reduce silica NP uptake [18].

MARCO
  • Macrophage receptor with collagenous structure has been linked to the uptake of polystyrene nanoparticles [121] within alveolar macrophages as well as aggregates of iron oxide [126].

Fc Receptors (CD64 )
  • Recognize the Fc region of IgG, one of the most abundant proteins in the human body and a vital part of the innate and humoral immune systems [127].

    • IgG adsorption to the surface of nanoparticles is well characterized [128130],

  • Induce phagocytosis[127]