Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2015 Sep 9;16(12):1221–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.009

Table 2.

Detailed characteristics of included studies

Study ID Year Journal Pubmed ID Trial registry ID
Abrams 2007 2007 Neurology 17296917 NCT00046722
Population 55 HIV + adults with symptomatic HIV-DSPN and at least 30/100
VAS, on stable pain regimen for 8 weeks prior to enrolment, with
prior experience of smoking cannabis randomized in 2 groups of size:
27/28. Our Bayesian analysis is based on 50 participants with one
observation per patient, as provided by the primary study authors.

Age (Experimental, Control): 50 years (SD ±6)), 47 (SD ± 7)

Gender (male/female/other): Experimental 22/5/0 Control 26/2/0
Intervention Experimental: Patient smoked one cigarette three times per day as
tolerated

Pre-rolled, whole herb Cannabis cigarettes were provided by NIDA and
contained 3.56% delta-9-THC.

Control: identical pre-rolled cigarettes with the active ingredient extracted.

Dose estimate: 32 mg THC per session; 96 mg THC per day
Primary Outcome Daily pain diary recording the VAS at 8am for average pain during the
previous 24 hours.
Study Methods Randomized, double-blind (patient, outcome assessor), parallel
design, placebo controlled, single center (university) clinical trial in
San Francisco, California, USA starting in 2003
Notes Also published as an abstract at the 2nd Annual meeting of the International
Association for Cannabis as Medicine, 2005

Secondary outcomes: Acute analgesic effects: Long thermal stimulation

Anti-hyperalgesic effects: Heat-capsaicin model, Profile of Mood States
Study ID Year Journal Pubmed ID Trial registry ID
Ellis 2009 2008 Neuropsychopharmacology 18688212 NCT00255580
Population 34 HIV + adults with symptomatic HIV-DSPN and pain score >5/20
on DDS (Discriptor Differential Scale), most participants were
previously exposed to potentially neurotoxic deoxy-nucleoside
reverse transcriptase inhibitors; 16 started control/experimental, 18
started experimental/control. 28 participants with a total of 56
observed responses were included in the Bayesian analysis.

Age (all) 49.1 years (SD ±6.9)),

Gender (male/female/other): 33/1/0
Intervention Experimental: Patient smoked cannabis, titrating dose up or down to
effective pain control/ tolerable adverse effects, starting at 4 percent to
range between 1 to 8 percent delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)
concentration by weight. Pre-rolled, whole herb Cannabis cigarettes were
provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Control: identical pre-rolled cigarettes with the active ingredient extracted.

Dose estimate: average 96 mg THC per day
Primary Outcome Crossover difference in change of DDS (Descriptor Differential Scale 0-20
scale “a ratio scale containing 24 words describing pain intensity and
unpleasantness.”) comparing baseline to after treatment
Study Methods Randomized, double-blind (patient, outcome assessor), cross-over
design, placebo controlled, single center (university) clinical trial at
the University of California, San Diego in 2006
Notes Secondary outcomes: McGill Questionaire, VAS, SIP (Sickness Impact
Profile), BSI (Brief Symptom Inventory), UKU side effect rating,
Highness/Sedation Scale, HIV load
Study ID Year Journal Pubmed ID Trial registry ID
Ware 2010 2010 Canadian Medical
Association Journal
20805210 ISRCTN68314063
Population 23 adults with non HIV neuropathy pain of at least 3 months duration
caused by trauma or surgery defined by pain intensity score greater
than 40/100 VAS, on a stable analgesic regimen, not having smoked
cannabis in the preceding year. 23 participants with a total of 86
observed responses were included in the Bayesian analysis.

Age (all): 45.4 years (SD ±12.3)

Gender (male/female/other): 11/12/0
Intervention Experimental: NIDA and Prairie plant systems prepared three different
potencies of THC (2.5%, 6%, 9.4%) from whole herb in gelatine capsules
inhaled through pipe.

Control: Ethanolic extraction was used to prepare the placebo.

Dose estimate: 0, 1.625, 3.9 and 5.85 mg/day (average) THC per period
Primary Outcome Average Daily Pain Intensity on the 11-item numeric rating scale (NRS)
average over five treatment days (least pain value, average pain value and
worst pain value) during four consecutive crossover periods of 14 days each
(five treatment days and 9 washout days afterwards)
Study Methods Randomized, double-blind (patient, outcome assessor), 4 period crossover
Latin square design, placebo controlled, single center (university) clinical
trial in McGill University, Montreal, Canada, starting in 2003
Notes The linear model did not consider inter participant effect.

Secondary outcomes: Pain Quality: McGill Questionaire, Sleep (Leeds Sleep
Evaluation Questionaire), Mood Effects: short-form Profile of Mood States,
Quality of Life: EQ-5D health outcomes
Study ID Year Journal Pubmed ID Trial registry ID
Wilsey 2008 2008 The Journal of Pain 18403272 NCT00254761
Population 38 adults with non HIV neuropathy (complex regional pain syndrome
(CRPS type I), spinal cord injury, peripheral neuropathy, or nerve
injury) with prior cannabis experience and a VAS > 30/100. 38
participants with 102 observed responses were included in the
Bayesian analysis.

Age (all): 46 years (range 21-71)

Gender (male/female/other): 20/18/0
Intervention Experimental Participants inhaled a total of 9 standardized cued-puff.
Cannabis was harvested from whole plant and rolled into cigarettes at the U
of Mississippi under supervision of NIDA ranging in strength from 0%, 3.5% to 7%.

Control: Placebo Cigarettes were made from whole plant with extraction of Cannabis.

Dose estimate: 0 Placebo, 19.25 (low dose, range 7-30.45), 34.3 (high
dose, range 18.9-60.9) mg THC/day (Session)
Primary Outcome VAS measuring spontaneous pain relief; time effects were studied with a
linear model.
Study Methods Randomized, double-blind (patient, outcome assessor), parallel
design, placebo controlled, single center (university) clinical trial at
UC Davis Medical Center Sacramento, California started in
November 2003
Notes Secondary outcomes: pain unpleasantness (VAS), heat pain threshold,
Neuropathic Pain Scale, Neurocognitive assessment and plasma Cannabis
concentration
Study ID Year Journal Pubmed ID Trial registry ID
Wilsey 2013 2013 The Journal of Pain 23237736 NCT01037088
Population 39 adults with non HIV neuropathy due to reflex sympathetic
dystrophy, peripheral neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia, post-stroke
pain, multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury with previous cannabis
exposure (16 current, 23 ex-users) and a VAS pain intensity greater
than 30/100. 39 participants with 111 observed responses were
included in the Bayesian analysis.

Age (all): 50 years (SD ±11))

Gender (male/female/other): 28/11/0
Intervention Experimental: Participants used a volcano vaporizer under the flexible-dose
design of Wilsey 2008. The minimum and maximum cumulative doses
for each visit were 8 and 12 puffs. Cannabis was harvested at the University of
Mississippi under the supervision of NIDA.

Control: Placebo was made from whole plant with removal of cannabinoids.

Dose estimate: Maximum of 0, 10.32, 28 mg THC/day (Session),
presuming they were administered the entire 800 mg dose.
Primary Outcome VAS before and after consuming vaporized cannabis.
Study Methods Randomized, double-blind (patient, outcome assessor), crossover design,
placebo controlled, single center (university) clinical trial at the University of
California, Davis, started December 2009
Notes Secondary outcomes: Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC);
Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS); WAIS-III, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test
(revised), Grooved Pegboard Test

We provide detailed characteristics of the five included randomized controlled clinical trials investigating smoked or inhaled cannabis for painful neuropathy. Two trials recruited patients with HIV related Distal Sensory Polyneuropathy (HIV DSPN), three included participants with neuropathies of other etiologies. (VAS Visual Analogue Scale; SD Standard deviation; NA not available; NIDA US National Institute of Drug Abuse)