Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Violence Vict. 2015;30(4):581–599. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00176

Table 2.

Logistic Regression Coefficients and Odds Ratios Predicting Relationship Termination (N=245).a

Predictor Bivariate Full Model

b exp(b) SE b exp(b) SE
Positive Relationship Dynamics
 Intimate Self-disclosure −0.46** 0.63 0.16 −0.45* 0.64 0.19
 Passionate Love −0.48** 0.619 0.18 −0.55** 0.58 0.21
 Instrumental Support −0.83*** 0.437 0.18 −0.81*** 0.45 0.20
Negative Relationship Dynamics
 Emotional/Psychological Abuse 0.09* 1.092 0.16 0.08 1.08 0.04
 Poor Communication 0.61** 1.842 0.20 0.56* 1.76 0.23
 Verbal Conflict 0.12 1.122 0.14 0.39* 1.48 0.17
Perceived Relationship Alternatives
 Alternatives 0.41** 1.511 0.15 0.54** 1.71 0.17
Social Support
 Global Parental Support 0.18 0.938 0.37 0.14 1.15 0.41
 Global Peer Support −0.05 0.832 0.19 0.09 1.09 0.24
 Parental Approval of Partner −0.31** 0.735 0.12 −0.40** 0.67 0.13
 Peer Approval −0.56*** 0.573 0.14 −0.65*** 0.52 0.16
 Negative Appraisals 0.55*** 1.729 0.13 0.70*** 2.02 0.16
a

Full Models include controls for sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, race/ethnicity, family structure, mother’s education), adult status characteristics (attending school, employment status, parent), and relationship characteristics (duration, sexual intimacy).

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001