Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 2;15:322. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0693-y

Table 1.

Demographic and obstetric characteristics among super-obese and comparison women who gave birth in Australia, 2010

Super-obese group (N = 370) Comparison (N = 621) P value
No. % No. %
Age (years)
  < 25 60 16.2 99 15.9 1.00
 25–29 109 29.5 185 29.8
 30–34 110 29.7 187 30.1
  ≥ 35 91 24.6 150 24.2
Indigenous status
 No 341 92.2 572 92.1 0.23
 Yes 17 4.6 19 3.1
 Not stated 12 3.2 30 4.8
Marital status
 Single 71 19.2 71 11.4 <0.01
 Married/cohabit 277 74.9 508 81.8
 Not stated 22 5.9 42 6.8
Private health insurance
 No 356 96.2 474 76.3 <0.01
 Yes 14 3.8 145 23.3
 Not stated 0 0.0 2 0.3
Smoking during pregnancy
 No 265 71.6 484 77.9 <0.01
 Yes 88 23.8 100 16.1
 Not stated 17 4.6 37 6.0
Assisted reproductive technology
 No 357 96.5 574 92.4 0.17
 Yes 11 3.0 29 4.7
 Not stated 2 0.5 18 2.9
Parity
 0 115 31.1 251 40.4 <0.01
 1–2 173 46.8 313 50.4
 3+ 82 22.2 57 9.2
Multiple gestation pregnancy
 No 362 97.8 608 97.9 0.81
 Yes 8 2.2 12 1.9
 Not stated 0 0.0 1 0.2
Socio-economic statusa
 Most disadvantage 1 66 17.8 49 7.9 <0.01
 2 68 18.4 73 11.8
 3 109 29.5 121 19.5
 4 80 21.6 181 29.1
 Least disadvantage 5 40 10.8 191 30.8
 Not stated 7 1.9 6 1.0
Previous caesarean section (exclude primiparous)
 No 140 54.9 250 67.6 <0.01
 Yes 112 43.9 115 31.1
 Not stated 3 1.2 5 1.4

aSocio-Economic Indexes for Areas Index for Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage quintiles assigned to those residents in the most disadvantaged areas to Quintile 1 and those in the least disadvantaged areas to Quintile 5