Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Jul;145(7):745–750. doi: 10.14219/jada.2014.34

Table 2.

Unadjusted and adjusted geometric mean ratios of urinary bisphenol A levels, according to sealant and restoration exposure.

TREATMENT EXPOSURE NO. BPA GEOMETRIC MEAN (WEIGHTED) UNADJUSTED BPA GEOMETRIC MEAN RATIO (95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS) P VALUE ADJUSTED BPA GEOMETRIC MEAN RATIO (95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS) P VALUE

Sealants n = 1,000 n = 873
Zero 661 3.54 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
One to three 151 3.75 1.06 (0.86, 1.30) 0.57 1.05 (0.88, 1.27) 0.55
Four to six 124 3.35 0.95 (0.76, 1.19) 0.62 0.95 (0.76, 1.18) 0.61
Seven to 16 64 4.34 1.23 (0.93, 1.62 0.14 1.25 (0.86, 1.82) 0.23

Restorations n = 1,001 n = 873
Zero 501 3.42 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
One to three 185 4.14 1.21 (0.95, 1.54) 0.11 1.22 (1.01, 1.48) 0.04
Four to six 102 3.42 1.00 (0.77, 1.29) 0.99 1.09 (0.82, 1.45) 0.53
Seven to 42 213 3.61 1.05 (0.78, 1.42) 0.71 1.20 (0.94, 1.53) 0.13

Sealants (10-unit change) 1.18 (0.94, 1.49) 0.15 1.11 (0.82, 1.52) 0.47

Restorations (10-unit change) 0.99 (0.80, 1.23) 0.95 1.06 (0.90, 1.26) 0.45

*Adjusted for child's age, sex, race or ethnicity, urinary creatinine and serum cotinine concentrations, body mass index, parent's education status, and number of sealants (for restoration estimates) or restorations (for sealant estimates).