Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Educ Psychol Rev. 2015 Jun 2;27(4):617–633. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9314-6

Table 3.

Study Active Sample Near Sensible Follow Results
Alloway 2013 Y Y Y N Y No transfer to spelling or math
Ang 2015 Y Y Y Y Y No transfer to math
Chacko 2014 Y Y Y Y N No transfer to reading, spelling, or math
Dunning 2013 Y Y Y Y Y No transfer to reading and math
Gray 2012 Y Y Y Y N No transfer to reading, spelling, or math
Henry 2014 Y N Y Y Y No transfer to reading or number skills
Holmes 2009 Y Y Y Y N No transfer to reading or math
Karbach 2014 Y N Y Y Y Transfer to reading, no transfer to math
Van der Molen 2010 Y Y Y Y Y No transfer to reading or arithmetic
Alloway 2012 ? N Y N N Transfer to math, no transfer to spelling
Aries 2014 E2 N N Y Y N No transfer to history reasoning school exam
Bergman-Nutley 2014 N Y Y Y N Transfer to math; impaired WM training vs TD control
Egeland 2013/Hovik 2013 N Y Y N Y Transfer to reading, no transfer to math
Foy 2014 N Y Y Y N No transfer to pre-reading skills
Kroesbergen et al 2014 N N Y Y N Transfer to early numeracy skills
Rode 2014 N Y Y Y Y Transfer to reading fluency, no transfer to reading comprehension or math
St Clair-Thompson 2010 N Y Y ? Y Transfer to mental math, no transfer to reading and 2 other arithmetic tests
Witt 2011 N N Y Y N Transfer to addition

Note. Studies in bold considered strongest evidence given their use of an active-control group. Active: Did study include active control group? Sample: Did each group in study have sample size with minimum of 20 subjects? Near: Did results indicate near transfer to working memory? Sensible: Did transfer results exhibit a sensible pattern? Follow: Did study include follow-up assessment?