Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 2;10(12):e0143644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143644

Table 6. Comparison between number of oncogenic HPV genotypes* detected in the three different samples (s-FTA vs. Dr-WET; s-FTA vs. s-DRY; s-DRY vs. Dr-WET).

N. of hr-HPV types detected in Dr-WET samples N. of hr-HPV types detected in s-DRY samples
N. of hr-HPV types detected in s-FTA samples 0 1 2 3+ Total 0 1 2 3+ Total
0 48 7 3 0 58 38 15 2 3 58
1 9 29 9 4 51 9 20 13 9 51
2 0 5 9 1 15 0 3 7 5 15
3+ 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 6 6
Total 57 1 21 11 130 47 38 22 23 130
N. of hr-HPV types detected in s-DRY samples
0 43 3 1 0 47
1 12 26 0 0 38
2 1 5 15 1 22
3+ 1 7 5 10 23
Total 57 41 21 11 130

Abbreviations: n. = number; Dr-WET = physician-collected samples using specimen transport medium; s-DRY = self-collected samples using dry swab without transport medium; s-FTA = self-collected samples using a cytobrush applied to an FTA cartridge

*Oncogenic genotypes include types 16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, 69, 73, 82 (Seegene, Anyplex II HPV28)