Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 1;9(11):GC01–GC05. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14471.6855

[Table/Fig-4]:

Differences between C325T genotypes respect to sex in cases and controls

T2DM Patients Males (n=138) Females (n=112) p-value OR (CI=95%) χ2
CC 79 (57.2%) 69 (61.6%) Reference
CT 51 (37%) 36 (32.1%) 0.43 0.80 (0.4, 1.3) 0.6
TT 8 (5.8%) 7 (6.3%) 0.99 1.0 (0.3, 2.9) 0.001
CT+TT 59 (42.8%) 43 (38.3%) 0.48 0.8 (0.5, 1.3) 0.5
Controls Males (n=144) Females (n=106) p-value OR (CI=95%) χ2
CC 92 (63.9%) 60 (56.6%) Reference
CT 43 (29.9%) 36 (34%) 0.37 1.2 (0.7, 2.2) 0.8
TT 9 (6.2%) 10 (9.4%) 0.27 1.7 (0.6, 4.4) 1.2
CT+TT 52 (36.1%) 46 (43.4%) 0.24 1.3 (0.8, 2.2) 1.3

OR, Odds ratio, 95% CI- 95% confidence interval, χ2, Chi-square analysis calculated by SPSS v.19, calculated the SLC30A8 genotypes with gender between female’s vs males as males are higher in integer

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure