Table 4.
Factors associated with the presence of oral diseases among female sex workers followed up from June to August 2013 at “Clinique de Confiance”, Abidjan, 2013
| Variable | n/N | Periodontitis (N = 247)a | n/N | Carious lesions (N = 247)a | n/N | Oral-mucosal lesions (N = 247)a | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multivariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||||||||
| aOR | 95 % CI | P | aOR | 95 % CI | P | aOR | 95 % CI | P | ||||
| Past history of dental consultation | - | - | - | <10−2 | - | - | - | |||||
| No | 129/219 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Yes | 25/28 | 6.4 | [1.8 22.3] | |||||||||
| Tobacco consumption | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.39 | |||||||||
| Non-smokers | 27/178 | 1.0 | 112/178 | 1.0 | 17/178 | 1.0 | ||||||
| Smokers < 10 cig/d | 2/28 | 0.30 | [0.1 1.4] | 18/28 | 0.8 | [0.3 2.0] | 1/28 | 0.5 | [0.1 5.1] | |||
| Smokers ≥ 10 cig/d | 7/41 | 0.60 | [0.2 1.7] | 24/41 | 0.5 | [0.2 1.2] | 2/41 | 0.6 | [0.1 3.4] | |||
| Alcohol consumption | 0.12 | 0.60 | 0.30 | |||||||||
| No | 15/115 | 1.0 | 78/115 | 1.0 | 12/115 | 1.0 | ||||||
| Yes audit score <8 | 11/83 | 1.2 | [0.4 2.9] | 41/83 | 0.5 | [0.3 0.9] | 7/83 | 0.8 | [0.3 2.3] | |||
| Yes audit score ≥8 | 10/49 | 2.9 | [0.9 9.0] | 35/49 | 1.1 | [0.5 2.5] | 1/49 | 0.3 | [0.0 3.0] | |||
| HIV serologic status | 0.01 | - | - | - | <10−2 | |||||||
| HIV- | 16/165 | 1.0 | 1/165 | 1.0 | ||||||||
| HIV+ | 20/82 | 2.6 | [1.2 5.8] | 19/82 | 50.0 | [6.4 384.6] | ||||||
| Oral hygiene index | <10−2 | 0.04 | 0.06 | |||||||||
| [0 0.9] | 2/69 | 1.0 | 35/69 | 1.0 | 2/69 | 1.0 | ||||||
| [1 1.9] | 10/87 | 3.4 | [0.6 16.4] | 60/87 | 2.5 | [1.3 5.0] | 5/87 | 1.4 | [0.2 8.7] | |||
| ≥2 | 24/91 | 9.8 | [2.1 44.2] | 59/91 | 2.0 | [1.0 3.8] | 13/91 | 3.8 | [0.7 19.6] | |||
aTwo missing data during multivariate analysis
aOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval, P adjusted p-value