Table 1.
Percent of veterinary practices by type and province. Practice type was based on how the respondents’ self-classified their veterinary practices (n = 655)
| SA (n = 391) | EQ (n = 32) | FA (n = 28) | MA (n = 169) | CA (n = 23) | LA (n = 12) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC (n = 274) | 74 | 7 | 2 | 12 | 4 | 1 |
| AB (n = 227) | 55 | 5 | 7 | 26 | 3 | 4 |
| SK (n = 101) | 32 | 0 | 6 | 59 | 1 | 2 |
| MB (n = 53) | 56 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 6 | 0 |
| Weighted mean | 60 | 5 | 4 | 25 | 4 | 2 |
SA — Practice is exclusively (100%) small animals; EQ — Practice is exclusively (100%) equine; FA — Practice is exclusively (100%) food animals, MA — Practice is a combination of equine, food animals, and small animals; CA — Practice is exclusively (100%) companion animals, which includes both small animals and equine; LA — Practice is exclusively (100%) large animals, which includes food animals and equine; BC — British Columbia; AB — Alberta; SK — Saskatchewan; MB — Manitoba.