Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 20;1(1):3–9. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbu002

Table 1.

Compressive modulus and compressive strength testing of scaffolds

Microsphere size (µm) Polymer concentration Compressive modulus (MPa) Compressive strength (MPa)
300–355 Control 178 ± 2 14 ± 1.9
0.25% 147 ± 11 9.3 ± 0.1
1% 160 ± 44 14 ± 0.8
2% 109 ± 12 6.2 ± 2.0
425–600 Control 170 ± 58 3.7 ± 0.9
0.25% 105 ± 39 12 ± 2.2
1% 317 ± 103 11 ± 3.0
2% 202 ± 25 9.7 ± 0.8
600–710 Control 281 ± 107 12 ± 3.9
0.25% 242 ± 36 5.9 ± 1.7
1% 258 ± 51 4.4 ± 1.2
2% 223 ± 34 8.9 ± 2.4

All units are in MPa. All errors displayed are standard errors of the mean. Across three different sizes of microspheres (300–355, 425–600 and 600–710 µm), and four different nanofiber concentrations (0%, 0.25%, 1% and 2%), no statistical difference was found through two-way ANOVA (n = 3) for evaluation of compressive modulus. The high variability of individual scaffold groups is likely due to the random nature of the sintering process.