Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Contemp Psychother. 2015 May 14;45(4):215–225. doi: 10.1007/s10879-014-9292-x

Table 3.

Narrative exposure studies

Author Year Sample Sample size # Sessions/mins
of treatment
PTSD
outcome
measure
% Dropout Mean (SD) Effect size (Hedge’s g)


Pre Post/follow-up Within Between
Bichescu
et al.
2007 Full
PTSD
N = 18
NET n = 9
PED n = 9
5 sessions of
120 min
CIDI NET = 0%
PED = 0%
NET = 11.8 (1.6)
PED = 11.4 (3.0)
NET = 5.4 (1.3)
PED = 9.9 (4.1)
4.39
.42
1.41
Catani et al. 2009 Full
PTSD
N = 31
KIDNET n = 16
MED-RELAX n = 15
6 sessions of
60–90 min
UPID KIDNET = 0%
MED-
RELAX = 0%
KIDNET = 37.94
(14.8)
MED-
RELAX = 36.58
(14.9)
KIDNET = 12.41
(14.15)
MED-
RELAX = 12.59
(11.06)
1.76
1.83
.01
Ertl et al. 2011 Full
PTSD
N = 85
NET n = 29
Academic catch-
up + SC
n = 28
WL n = 28
8 sessions of
90–120 min
CAPS NET = 0%
Academic catch-
up + SC = 0%
WL = 0%
NET = 67.03 (14.74)
Academic catch-
up + SC = 62.54
(13.87)
WL = 63.61 (16.42)
NET = 46.73 (19.24)
Academic catch-
up + SC = 45.67
(21.53)
WL = 52.93 (20.83)
1.19
.93
.57
NET vs. Academic
catch-up + SC=
.05
NET vs.
WL = .31
Halvorsen
and
Stenmark
2010 Full
PTSD
N = 16 10 sessions of
90 min
CAPS NET = 0 % NET = 84.81 (13.85) NET = 67.5 (30.52) .73 N/A
Hensel-
Dittmann
et al.
2011 Full
PTSD
N = 28
NET n = 15
SIT n = 13
10 sessions of
90 min
CAPS NET = 20 %
SIT = 15 %
NET = 96.47 (15.89)
SIT = 85.15 (12.95)
NET = 76.73 (26.19)
SIT = 82.60 (18.80)
.91
.16
.25
Hijazi et al. 2014 Probable
PTSD
N = 63
NET n = 41
WL n = 22
3 sessions of
60–90 min
PTGI NET = 5%
WL = 0%
NET = 45.78 (23.85)
WL = 47.68 (22.66)
NET = 51.22 (25.40)
WL = 41.86 (21.73)
.22
.26
.38
Neuner et al. 2010 Full
PTSD
N = 32
NET n = 16
TAU n = 16
Median 9
sessions of
120 min
PDS NET = 13 %
TAU = 0%
NET = 38.9 (6.4)
TAU = 36.9 (8.0)
NET = 26.0 (9.2)
TAU = 34.1 (6.1)
1.63
.39
1.01
Neuner et al. 2008 Full
PTSD
N = 277
NET n = 111
TC n = 111
MG n = 55
6 sessions of
60–120 min
PDS NET = 4%
TC = 20 %
MG = 0%
NET = 25.9 (13.2)
TC = 26.7 (12.5)
MG = 21.3 (10.6)
NET = 5.4 (6.6)
TC = 5.3 (5.7)
MG = 10.1 (8.1)b
1.96
2.2 1.19b
NET vs. TC = .02
NET vs.
MG = .55b
Neuner et al. 2004 Full
PTSD
N = 43
NET n = 17
SC n = 14
PED n = 12
4 sessions of
90 min
PDS NET = 0%
SC = 14 %
PED = 0%
NET = 25.2 (7.4)
SC = 22.0 (8.0)
PED = 19.5 (8.0)
NET = 19.1 (11.7)
SC = 19.8 (10.9)
PED = 21.2 (9.4)
.62
.23
.19
NET vs SC = .06
NET vs
PED = .20
Onyut et al. 2005 Full
PTSD
N = 6 4–6 sessions of
60–120 min
CIDI KIDNET = 0 % KIDNET = 14.3 (1.9) KIDNET = 9.0 (2.2) 2.57 N/A
Pabst et al. 2014 Full
PTSD
N = 22
NET n = 11
TBE = 11
Mean 17 sessions
of 90 min
PDS NET = 18 %
TBE = 27 %
NET = 36.7 (5.9)
TBE = 36.9 (5.9)
NET = 29.0 (9.2)
TBE = 27.8 (13.8)
.99
.86
.10
Ruf et al. 2010 Full
PTSD
N = 26
KIDNET = 13
WL = 13
Mean 8 sessions
of 90–120 min
UPID KIDNET = 8%
WL = 0%
KIDNET = 43.3
(12.3)
WL = 38.3 (8.6)
KIDNET = 22.3
(18.6)
WL = 33.8 (17.4)b
1.34
.33
.62b
Schaal et al. 2009 Full
PTSD
N = 26
NET n = 12
IPT n = 14
4 sessions; at
least one
session
120–150 min
CAPS NET = 0%
IPT = 0%
NET = 67.17 (20.10)
IPT = 66.00 (14.10)
NET = 50.25 (19.20)
IPT = 54.93 (15.60)
.86a
.74a
.26a
Stenmark
et al.
2013 Full
PTSD
N = 81
NET n = 51
TAU n = 30
10 sessions of
90 min
CAPS NET = 36 %
TAU = 30 %
NET = 83.72 (15.51)
TAU = 83.67 (16.52)
NET = 56.76 (25.87)
TAU = 71.45 (24.77)
1.31a
.59a
.57a
Zang et al. 2013 Full
PTSD
N = 22
NET = 11
WL = 11
4 sessions of
60–90 min
IES-R
(Intrusion)
NET = 0%
WL = 0%
NET = 16.91 (6.88)
WL = 17.36 (3.17)
NET = 8.73 (4.56)
WL = 16.00 (4.29)
1.40
.36
1.58

NET narrative exposure therapy, PED psychoeducation, CIDI composite international diagnostic interview, KIDNET narrative exposure therapy for children, MED-RELAX meditation-relaxation, UPID UCLES PTSD index, CAPS clinician administered PTSD scale, SC supportive counseling, SIT stress inoculation training, WL waitlist, PTGI posttraumatic growth inventory, TAU treatment as usual, TBE treatment by experts for borderline personality disorder, PDS posttraumatic diagnostic scale, TC trauma counseling, MG no-treatment monitoring group, IPT interpersonal psychotherapy

a

Effect size based on completer data because ITT was not reported

b

Data from 6 months follow-up assessment