Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 3.
Published in final edited form as: Dalton Trans. 2015 Oct 7;44(37):16494–16505. doi: 10.1039/c5dt02689j

Table 1.

Average best fits of ITC experimental data for BCA/Cu+ titrations at 25 °C to a one-site binding modela

Buffer pH [MeCN] (mM) n ΔH kJ mol–1 (kcal mol–1) KITC (×106)
BCA → CuI
Tris 7.5 25 2.11 ± 0.05 –28 ± 1 (–6.7 ± 0.2) 2.2 ± 0.2
Tris 8.0 10b 1.96 ± 0.04 –27.3 ± 0.8 (–6.5 ± 0.2) 2.3 ± 0.3
Tris 8.0 25 2.02 ± 0.01 –27.0 ± 0.2 (–6.45 ± 0.05) 2.0 ± 0.3
Tris 8.0 500 1.9 ± 0.1 –28 ± 1 (–6.7 ± 0.2) 3.6 ± 0.3
Tris 8.0 1000 2.01 ± 0.09 –27.1 ± 0.7 (–6.5 ± 0.1) 1.1 ± 0.1
Tris 8.5 25 1.98 ± 0.03 –27.0 ± 0.5 (–6.5 ± 0.1) 0.8 ± 0.1
Bis-Tris 6.0 25 2.04 ± 0.01 –38.0 ± 0.2 (–9.09 ± 0.05) 2.4 ± 0.1
Bis-Tris 7.0 25 1.95 ± 0.01 –37.0 ± 0.4 (–8.84 ± 0.09) 2.3 ± 0.5
HEPES 7.0 25 2.08 ± 0.01 –37.0 ± 0.5 (–8.8 ± 0.1) 2.4 ± 0.4
CuI → BCA
Tris 8.0 500 0.51 ± 0.01 –53.2 ± 0.2 (–12.81 ± 0.05) 2±3
HEPES 7.0 500 0.48 ± 0.01 –72.4 ± 0.5 (–13.3 ± 0.1) 5±3
a

All data collected in 25 mM buffer and 100 mM NaCl. Fit parameters represent the average of at least three independent titrations.

b

[Cu+] in reaction cell = 50 μM to ensure Cu+ stability. All other reactions are conducted with 125 μMCu+.