Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 3.
Published in final edited form as: Dalton Trans. 2015 Oct 7;44(37):16494–16505. doi: 10.1039/c5dt02689j

Table 2.

Average best fits of ITC experimental data for ligand → Cu+ titrations at 25 °Ca

Ligand Model n 1 ΔH1 kJ mol–1 (kcal mol–1) K1 (×106) ΔH2 kJ mol–1 (kcal mol–1) K2 (×106)
25 mM Tris pH 8.0
BCS One site 2.11 ± 0.05 –37 ± 1 (–8.84 ± 0.02) 22 ± 2
BCS Sequential –33 ± 1 (–7.9 ± 0.2) 150 ± 60 –42 ± 2 (–10.0 ± 0.5) 40 ± 1
GSH One site 1.03 ± 0.3 –118.9 ± 0.7 (–28.4 ± 0.2) 1.3 ± 0.1
25 mM HEPES pH 7.5
GSH One site 0.99 ± 0.01 –104 ± 4 (–24.9 ± 0.9) 0.32 ± 0.08
GSH Sequential –98 ± 2 (–23 ± 1) 0.3 ± 0.2 –6±20(–1 ± 5) 0.001 ± 0.001
a

All data collected in 100 mM NaCl and 25 mM MeCN. Fit parameters represent the average of at least two independent titrations. Error is calculated by propagation of individual fits; see Experimental for explanation.