. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Behav. 2015 Sep;39(5):709–720. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.39.5.12

Table 4.

Logistic Regression Models of Maintaining Weight Loss Stratified by Proximity to Goal Weight

Model	Effect	b	SE	Den. df	Wald	p-value
Close to Goal: Main Effects	Promotion Focus	−0.12	0.34	99	0.12	.73
Close to Goal: Main Effects	Prevention Focus	0.17	0.21	99	0.67	.42

Close to Goal: Interactions with Treatment Group	Promotion*Tx	−0.49	0.79	97	0.39	.54
Close to Goal: Interactions with Treatment Group	Prevention*Tx	1.41	0.54	97	6.89	.009

Far from Goal: Main Effects	Promotion Focus	0.41	0.19	253	4.59	.03
Far from Goal: Main Effects	Prevention Focus	−0.21	0.13	253	2.42	.12

Far from Goal: Interactions with Treatment Group	Promotion*Tx	0.05	0.38	251	0.02	.89
Far from Goal: Interactions with Treatment Group	Prevention*Tx	−0.28	0.27	251	1.13	.29

Note.

Only effects of interest are shown, but all lower order terms were included in each model. Additionally, models controlled for treatment group, age, sex, and education. SE = standard error; Den. df = denominator degrees of freedom (all numerator df = 1).