Table 1.

Parameters of the various network models considered in the numerical study and associated symbols used in Fig. 4.

#	Symbol	Fiber Axial Behavior	$\overline{{(EA)}_f}/{(EA)}_{f0}$	Distribution	Geometry
1	Open Cyan Diamonds	Symmetric	103	Normal	Voronoi
2	Green Plus Signs	Symmetric	102	Normal	Voronoi
3	Open Grey Squares	Symmetric	10−2	Normal	Voronoi
4	Filled Red Diamonds	Symmetric	10−3	Normal	Voronoi
5	Open Black Triangles*	Symmetric	10−3	Normal	Voronoi
6	Red Crosses	Symmetric	10−3	Bimodal†	Voronoi
7	Open Black Circles	Symmetric	10−3	Lognormal	Voronoi
8	Filled Green Diamonds‡	Symmetric	1	Normal	Voronoi
9	Filled Navy Triangles	Symmetric	10−3	Normal	Delaunay
10	Filled Blue Circles	Asymmetric	10−3	Bimodal	Delaunay
11	Filled Black Squares§	Symmetric	N/A	Bimodal	Delaunay
12	Filled Green Circles	Symmetric	10−3	Bimodal	Mikado

^*This sample included a different geometric replica of the Voronoi network.

^†In these tests the stiffness of each fiber was randomly chosen as either $\overline{{(\mathit{EA})}_{\mathit{f}}}+{\mathit{\sigma }}_{{(\mathit{EA})}_{\mathit{f}}}$ or $\overline{{(\mathit{EA})}_{\mathit{f}}}-{\mathit{\sigma }}_{{(\mathit{EA})}_{\mathit{f}}}$.

^‡The elastic behavior of this sample was not close to either of the stretch or bending dominated asymptotes in Fig. 2.

^§Indicates tests on networks of linear springs (zero bending, torsional and shear stiffness).