Table 7.
Entomological data: EIR
| Intervention | Study ID | Study design | EIR (95% CI) |
Percent reduction (95% CI)1 |
Notes | |||
| Pre‐intervention | Post‐intervention | |||||||
| Control | Treatment | Control | Treatment | |||||
| Larviciding alone | Coulibaly 2011 MLI(2009 data) | Cluster‐RCT | ‐ | ‐ | 0.00 | 0.18 | Not estimable | Monthly EIR |
| Coulibaly 2011 MLI(2010 data) | Cluster‐RCT | ‐ | ‐ | 2.92 | 0.45 | 84.6 | Monthly EIR | |
| Fillinger 2008 TZA | Controlled before‐and‐after trial | 1.05 (0.68 to 1.65) |
0.81 (0.58 to 1.15) |
1.06 (0.64 to 1.77) |
0.56 (0.43 to 0.77) |
31.5 (‐59.4 to 70.6) |
Annual EIR (An. gambiae) | |
| Fillinger 2009 KEN | Controlled before‐and‐after trial | 11.98 (7.39 to 19.40) |
10.30 (7.20 to 14.95) |
1.68 (1.16 to 2.42) |
0.39 (0.19 to 0.79) |
73.0 (22.0 to 90.7) |
Annual EIR | |
| Geissbühler 2009 TZA | Controlled before‐and‐after trial | 1.44 (1.14 to 1.81) |
1.18 (0.80 to 1.73) |
1.24 (0.97 to 1.57) |
0.80 (0.60 to 1.06) |
21.3 (‐42.3 to 56.4) | Annual EIR | |
1Where pre‐ and post‐intervention data are reported, percent reduction was calculated by difference in differences method (see Methods). Where post‐intervention data only were reported, percent reduction was calculated as: 1 ‐ (mean density in treatment group/mean density in control group).