Table 8.
Intervention | Study ID | Study design | Human biting rate (95% CI) |
Percent reduction (95% CI)1 |
Notes | |||
Pre‐intervention | Post‐intervention | |||||||
Control | Treatment | Control | Treatment | |||||
Larviciding alone | Coulibaly 2011 MLI(2009 data) | Cluster‐RCT | ‐ | ‐ | 16.40 | 8.37 | 49.0 | Mean number of bites per person per month |
Coulibaly 2011 MLI (2010 data) | Cluster‐RCT | ‐ | ‐ | 41.40 | 22.43 | 45.8 | Mean number of bites per person per month | |
Fillinger 2008 TZA | Controlled before‐and‐after trial | 0.93 (0.60 to1.46) | 0.72 (0.51 to 1.02) | 0.94 (0.57 to 1.56) | 0.50 (0.38 to 0.68) |
31.3 (‐59.2 to 70.4) |
Mean number of bites per person per year (An. gambiae) | |
Fillinger 2009 KEN | Controlled before‐and‐after trial | 0.45 (0.28 to 0.73) | 0.39 (0.27 to 0.56) | 0.06 (0.04 to 0.09) | 0.014 (0.006 to 0.028) | 73.1 (20.3 to 90.9) |
Mean number of blood fed female anophelines per person per sampling date |
1 Where pre‐ and post‐intervention data were reported, percent reduction was calculated by difference in differences method (see Methods). Where post‐intervention data only were reported, percent reduction was calculated as: 1 ‐ (mean density in treatment group/mean density in control group).