Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 12;6(2):e1637. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.2

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis for overall survival.

Characteristics Overall survival
  Univariate
Multivariate
  HR (95% CI) P-valuea HR (95% CI) P-valuea
Age (years): ≥60 versus <60 1.721 (0.918–3.230) 0.091    
Gender: female versus male 0.788 (0.428–1.451) 0.788    
ECOG PS: ≥1 versus 0 1.960 (1.030–3.730) 0.040 1.583 (0.811–3.088) 0.178
Tumor size (cm): >4 versus ≤4 2.557 (1.374–4.757) 0.003 1.295 (0.633–2.652) 0.479
TNM stage: III+IV versus I+II 6.480 (3.224–13.024) <0.001 3.989 (1.299–12.253) 0.016
Tumor thrombus: yes versus no 10.717 (3.867–29.706) <0.001 3.042 (1.047–8.839) 0.041
Fuhrman grade: 3+4 versus 1+2 3.729 (1.931–7.202) <0.001 1.018 (0.364–2.849) 0.973
Necrosis: present versus absent 1.563 (0.863–2.830) 0.140    
p-PAK1: high versus low 3.627 (1.922–6.844) <0.001 2.245 (1.085–4.645) 0.029

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; ECOG-PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; p-PAK1, phospho-p21-activated kinase 1

a

P<0.05 is considered statistically significant

a

Bold values indicate P<0.05