. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Child Lang. 2015 Jun 5;43(4):760–783. doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000252

TABLE II.

Zero-order correlations between receptive vocabulary variables for bilingual participants (n = 50; RT n = 45)

Variables	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
	–	0·41^*	0·84^*	0·86^*	0·30	0·21	0·32	0·28	−0·25	0·53^*	0·06	−0·06
1. CDI L1 vocabulary		p = ·002	p< ·001	p< ·001	p = ·036	p = ·135	p = ·024	p = ·049	p = ·078	p < ·001	p = ·672	p = ·679
		–	0·85^*	0·78^*	0·23	0·33	0·35^*	0·37^*	0·28	0·77^*	0·07	0·00
2. CDI L2 vocabulary			p< ·001	p< ·001	p = ·108	p = ·018	p = ·013	p = ·008	p = ·053	p < ·001	p = ·637	p = ·998
			–	0·97^*	0·31	0·32	0·39^*	0·38^*	0·02	0·77^*	0·08	−0·04
3. CDI total vocabulary				p< ·001	p = ·029	p = ·023	p = ·005	p = ·006	p = ·899	p < ·001	p = ·605	p = ·804
				–	0·31	0·28	0·37^*	0·35^*	−0·02	0·63^*	−0·01	0·02
4. CDI conceptual vocabulary					p = ·027	p = ·047	p = ·008	p = ·013	p = ·890	p < ·001	p = ·962	p = ·916
						0·34^*	0·85^*	0·82^*	−0·33	0·24	−0·23	−0·20
5. CCT L1 accuracy						p = ·015	p < ·001	p < ·001	p = ·019	p = ·094	p = ·120	p = ·182
						–	0·78^*	0·79^*	−0·02	0·37^*	−0·03	−0·36^*
6. CCT L2 accuracy							p < ·001	p < ·001	p = ·889	p = ·007	p = ·854	p = ·014
							–	0·99^*	−0·23	0·38^*	−0·16	−0·31
7. CCT total vocabulary								p < ·001	p = ·113	p = ·007	p = ·270	p = ·037
								–	−0·20	0·39^*	−0·14	−0·35
8. CCT conceptual vocabulary									p = ·176	p = ·005	p = ·344	p = ·018
									–	0·10	0·21	0·09
9. L2 exposure										p = ·511	p = ·162	p = ·546
										–	0·22	−0·11
10. TE											p = ·139	p = ·470
											–	−0·23
11. Reaction time (RT) L1												p = ·134
12. Reaction time (RT) L2												–

NOTE:

indicates significance using a False Discovery Rate adjusted alpha for multiple comparisons (Benjamini & Hochberg, 1995).