Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 16;18(Suppl 2):56–62. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12111

Table 2.

Comparison of good outcomes between the Cleft Care UK (CCUK) study and the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study

CCUK CSAG P-value
Structural outcomes
 Facial appearance (% good or excellent) 36 32 0.107*
 Dento-alveolar relationships (% good or excellent) 53 30 <0.001
Oral health
 Caries-free (dmft = 0) (%) 48 45 0.6
Hearing
 None or mild hearing loss in better ear (%) 78 79 0.7
Speech
 No hypernasality (%) 90 82 0.018
 Intelligibility/distinctiveness (% normal) 56 20 <0.001
Psychosocial outcome
 Child’s self-confidence not affected (%) 92 81 <0.001
*

Mixed effects logistic regression to account for the non-independence of observations from multiple observers.

This is based on the 198 children with models as the 49 children with photographs were excluded.

Chi-squared test.