Table 2.
Comparison of good outcomes between the Cleft Care UK (CCUK) study and the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study
| CCUK | CSAG | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structural outcomes | |||
| Facial appearance (% good or excellent) | 36 | 32 | 0.107* |
| Dento-alveolar relationships (% good or excellent) | 53† | 30 | <0.001‡ |
| Oral health | |||
| Caries-free (dmft = 0) (%) | 48 | 45 | 0.6‡ |
| Hearing | |||
| None or mild hearing loss in better ear (%) | 78 | 79 | 0.7‡ |
| Speech | |||
| No hypernasality (%) | 90 | 82 | 0.018‡ |
| Intelligibility/distinctiveness (% normal) | 56 | 20 | <0.001‡ |
| Psychosocial outcome | |||
| Child’s self-confidence not affected (%) | 92 | 81 | <0.001‡ |
Mixed effects logistic regression to account for the non-independence of observations from multiple observers.
This is based on the 198 children with models as the 49 children with photographs were excluded.
Chi-squared test.