Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 16;18(Suppl 2):56–62. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12111

Table 3.

Comparison of poor outcomes between the Cleft Care UK (CCUK) study and the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study

CCUK CSAG P-value
Structural outcomes
 Facial appearance (% poor or very poor) 22 28 0.013*
 Dento-alveolar relationships (% poor or very poor) 19 36 <0.001
Oral health
 Caries present (dmft ≥1) (%) 52 55 0.6
Hearing
 Moderate or worse hearing loss in better ear (%) 22 21 0.7
Speech
 Hypernasality (%) 10 18 0.018
 Intelligibility/distinctiveness (% just intelligible or less) 17 19 0.6
Psychosocial outcome
 Child’s self-confidence affected (%) 8 19 <0.001
*

Mixed effects logistic regression to account for the non-independence of observations from multiple observers.

This is based on the 198 children with models as the 49 children with photographs were excluded.

Chi-squared test.