Table 3.
Comparison of poor outcomes between the Cleft Care UK (CCUK) study and the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study
| CCUK | CSAG | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structural outcomes | |||
| Facial appearance (% poor or very poor) | 22 | 28 | 0.013* |
| Dento-alveolar relationships (% poor or very poor) | 19† | 36 | <0.001‡ |
| Oral health | |||
| Caries present (dmft ≥1) (%) | 52 | 55 | 0.6‡ |
| Hearing | |||
| Moderate or worse hearing loss in better ear (%) | 22 | 21 | 0.7‡ |
| Speech | |||
| Hypernasality (%) | 10 | 18 | 0.018‡ |
| Intelligibility/distinctiveness (% just intelligible or less) | 17 | 19 | 0.6‡ |
| Psychosocial outcome | |||
| Child’s self-confidence affected (%) | 8 | 19 | <0.001‡ |
Mixed effects logistic regression to account for the non-independence of observations from multiple observers.
This is based on the 198 children with models as the 49 children with photographs were excluded.
Chi-squared test.