Skip to main content
. 2014 May 28;93(6):571–586. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12412

Table 6.

Perinatal outcome. Calculations are CTG+ST analysis vs. CTG alone

Meta-analysis Cochrane review Neilson (2012) European MA Becker et al. (2012) American MA Potti & Berghella (2012) Stockholm MA Salmelin et al. (2013) IPD MA Schuit et al. (2013)
Apgar score <7 at 5 min 103/7678 vs. 108/7624 (1.34 vs. 1.42%) Fixed-effect (I2 0.0%, chi-square = 0.44): RR 0.95 (0.73–1.24) 103/7697 vs. 108/7641 (1.34 vs. 1.41%) Fixed-effect (Tau2 0, I2 0%): RR 0.95 (0.73–1.2) 103/7678 vs. 108/7624 (1.34 vs. 1.42%) Unclear MA type: RR 0.95 (0.73–1.24) MA not performed 89/6524 vs. 78/6463 (1.36 vs. 1.21%) RR 1.14 (0.84–1.54)
Comments on Apgar score Random-effect model yielded same results Detailed RCT data not provided
Metabolic acidosis (pH <7.05 plus BDecf >12.0 mmol/L) MA not performed 50/7697 vs. 73/7641 (0.65 vs. 0.96%) Random-effect (Tau2 0.13, I2 33%): RR 0.72 (0.43–1.19) Fixed-effect: RR 0.68 (0.48-0.97) 59/7318 vs. 81/7256 (0.81 vs. 1.12%) Random-effect (Tau2 0.28, I2 62%, = 0.03): RR 0.80 (0.44–1.47) 51/6459 vs. 61/6409 (0.79 vs. 0.95%) Random-effect (Tau2 0.28, I2 63%, chi-square = 0.04): RR 0.96 (0.49–1.88) 57/6524 vs. 73/6463 (0.87 vs. 1.13%) (Tau2 0.09, I2 42%): RR 0.76 (0.53–1.10)
Comments metabolic acidosis BDecf analysis Finnish RCT BDecf data obtained via principal investigator, yet incorrect data in MA; incorrect data from Swedish RCT used Original, not revised Swedish RCT data included; Finnish RCT metabolic acidosis from BDblood data, not BDecf Incorrect data from Swedish RCT used; Finnish RCT metabolic acidosis from BDblood data, not BDecf Additional cases in comparison with original or revised articles: Swedish +1, French +6; error in addition of cases
Metabolic acidosis (pH <7.05 plus BDblood >12.0 mmol/L) 78/7318 vs. 113/7259 (1.06 vs. 1.56%) Random-effect (Tau2 0.24, I2 62%): RR 0.78 (0.44–1.37) MA not performed MA not performed MA not performed RR 0.82 (0.58–1.16)
Comments metabolic acidosis BDblood analysis MA is a mixture of BDblood metabolic acidosis (Finnish, Dutch RCTs) and BDecf metabolic acidosis (Plymouth, Swedish, French RCTs) Detailed IPD cannot be checked; Swedish and French RCTs excluded for unclear reasons
Cord artery pH <7.15 MA not performed MA not performed MA not performed MA not performed RR 0.99 (0.91–1.08)
Comments cord artery pH <7.15 Detailed IPD cannot be checked
Cord artery pH <7.05 MA not performed Included 5 RCTs, detailed data not provided Random-effects (statistics not provided): RR 0.97 (0.64–1.5) MA not performed MA not performed RR 0.87 (0.70–1.09)
Comments cord artery pH <7.05 Data not reported in original or revised Swedish RCT, unclear how Swedish data were retrieved Detailed IPD cannot be checked
Cord artery pH <7.00 MA not performed MA not performed MA not performed MA not performed RR 0.89 (0.62–1.26)
Comments on cord artery pH <7.00 Detailed IPD cannot be checked; error in addition of cases
Cord artery BDecf >12.0 mmol/L MA not performed MA not performed MA not performed MA not performed RR 1.07 (0.90–1.29)
Comments on cord artery BDecf >12.0 mmol/L Detailed IPD cannot be checked; error in addition of cases; low quality of French RCT data [see 6]
Cord artery BDblood >12.0 mmol/L MA not performed MA not performed MA not performed MA not performed RR 0.98 (0.82–1.16)
Comments on cord artery BDblood >12.0 mmol/L Detailed IPD cannot be checked; error in addition of cases
Admission neonatal intensive care unit 615/7678 vs. 685/7624 (8.00 vs. 8.98%) Fixed-effect (I2 0.0%, chi-square = 0.97): RR 0.89 (0.81–0.99) Included 5 RCTs, detailed data not provided Random-effect (statistics not provided): RR 0.90 (0.76–1.1) 264/7678 vs. 289/7624 (3.44 vs. 3.79%) Unknown MA type: RR 0.90 (0.76–1.06) MA not performed RR 0.92 (0.76–1.09)
Comments neonatal intensive care unit admission Fixed-effect model yielded same results Error in numbers of index cases, cannot be checked due to lack of detailed information in MA article Detailed IPD cannot be checked; fewer cases included from Finnish and French RCTs than in original articles
Neonatal encephalopathy 8/7678 vs. 15/7624 (0.10 vs. 0.20%) Fixed-effect (I2 0%, chi-square = 0.51): RR 0.54 (0.24–1.25) Sarnat & Sarnat grade ≥2 data only: included 3 RCTs, detailed data not provided Random-effect (statistics not provided): RR 0.66 (0.19–2.3) 8/7678 vs. 15/7624 (0.10 vs. 0.20%) Fixed-effect (I2 0%, chi-square = 0.51): RR 0.54 (0.24–1.25) 7/6478 vs. 11/6426 (0.11 vs. 0.17%) Random-effect (statistics not provided): RR 0.63 (0.24–1.63) RR 0.42 (0.11–1.64)
Comments neonatal encephalopathy No uniform definition of encephalopathy in RCTs; no data in Plymouth RCT – data in MA provided by RCT authors Fixed-effects model yielded same results; 3 RCTs included but Sarnat & Sarnat stage ≥2 data reported only in Swedish and Dutch RCTs No uniform definition of encephalopathy in RCTs; no data in Plymouth RCT – unclear how Plymouth data were obtained No uniform definition of encephalopathy in RCTs; figures for Sarnat & Sarnat stage ≥1 from Swedish RCT used but ≥2 from Dutch RCT Detailed IPD cannot be checked; numbers fewer than in original RCT articles, reported hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy
Neonatal intubation 7/714 vs. 9/722 (0.98 vs. 1.24%) MA not performed because only 1 RCT MA not performed MA not performed RR 0.64 (0.35–1.20)
Comments on neonatal intubation Data available only from Finnish RCT Detailed IPD cannot be checked; data from French and Dutch RCTs supplemented; incorrect data from Finnish RCT
Perinatal death 8/7697 vs. 5/7641 (0.10 vs. 0.065%) Fixed-effect (I2 0.0%, chi-square = 0.69): RR 1.49 (0.53–4.18) Included 3 RCTs, detailed data not provided Random-effect (statistics not provided): RR 1.17 (0.38–3.6) 8/7697 vs. 5/7641 (0.10 vs. 0.065%) Fixed-effect (I2 0%, chi-square = 0.69): RR 1.49 (0.53–4.18) MA not performed RR 1.24 (0.33–4.61)
Comments on perinatal death No data on perinatal death in Plymouth RCT – data in MA provided by RCT authors Fixed-effects model yielded same results; data from 4 RCTs available, Finnish RCT data inexplicably excluded; unclear if data were corrected for lethal malformations Perinatal death data included from 5 RCTs, but no data on how perinatal mortality data in the Plymouth RCT were obtained Swedish RCT represented by mortality corrected for lethal malformations, but Dutch RCT by uncorrected mortality