Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol. 2015 Jun 6;69(1):166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.032

Table 4.

Incidence of PeINa by HPV type detected in the lesion among menb with the same HPV type detected at the genitals in the HIM Study

HPV Typede Incidence Ratec (95% CI) Cumulative Incidence (%)
6-Month (95% CI) 12-Month (95% CI) 24-Month (95% CI)
Any 0.1 (0.1–0.2) 0.1 (0.0–0.2) 0.1 (0.0–0.2) 0.3 (0.1–0.4)
Vaccinef 0.5 (0.2–0.9) 0.5 (0.0–0.9) 0.6 (0.1–1.1) 1.3 (0.4–2.2)
High Risk 0.1 (0.0–0.2) 0.1 (0.0–0.2) 0.1 (0.0–0.2) 0.3 (0.0–0.6)
16 0.7 (0.3–1.6) 0.5 (0.1–2.1) 0.5 (0.1–2.1) 2.1 (0.9–5.2)
Low Risk 0.1 (0.0–0.2) 0.1 (0.0–0.3) 0.2 (0.0–0.4) 0.2 (0.0–0.4)
6 0.3 (0.0–1.3) 0.4 (0.1–2.9) 0.9 (0.2–3.4) 0.9 (0.2–3.4)
11 0.6 (0.0–3.4) 1.4 (0.2–9.2) 1.4 (0.2–9.2) 1.4 (0.2–9.2)
73 0.4 (0.0–2.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0)

Abbreviation: PeIN- penile intraepithelial neoplasia, CI-confidence interval.

a

DNA detected using Linear Array.

b

Newly acquired-pathologically confirmed PeIN.

c

Incidence rate is cases per 1000 person-months.

d

Prevalent and incident genital HPV infection.

e

HPV types 18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/68/26/40/53/54/66/69/71/70/82 did not progress to a PeIN lesion; therefore, incidence rates and cumulative incidence could not be calculated.

f

Vaccine HPV types 6/11/16/18