Table 3. Change in global efficiency after isolated removal of nodes.

	Brain regions	Δ Eglob (%)		Brain regions	Δ Eglob (%)		Brain regions	Δ Eglob (%)
1	PHG-L	−2.00	31	SPG-L	−0.37	61	ORBsupb-R	0.03
2	OLF-L	−1.73	32	AMYG-L	−0.35	62	SFGdor-L	0.06
3	INS-L	−1.53	33	HES-R	−0.33	63	CUN-L	0.10
4	FFG-L	−1.39	34	SMA-L	−0.32	64	ORBsupb-L	0.17
5	ROL-L	−1.17	35	PreCG-L	−0.31	65	IFGoperc-R	0.17
6	PoCG-R	−1.11	36	SOG-R	−0.30	66	FFG-R	0.17
7	SPG-R	−0.97	37	HIP-R	−0.30	67	CAL-L	0.21
8	INS-R	−0.93	38	PUT-L	−0.30	68	MTG-R	0.22
9	SMA-R	−0.84	39	PreCG-R	−0.29	69	MOG-R	0.22
10	IFGoperc-L	−0.84	40	SMG-R	−0.28	70	MOG-L	0.23
11	MCG-R	−0.81	41	PHG-R	−0.26	71	LING-R	0.25
12	PoCG-L	−0.80	42	SMG-L	−0.24	72	MTG-L	0.25
13	ROL-R	−0.78	43	PAL-L	−0.23	73	MFG-L	0.28
14	OLF-R	−0.75	44	LING-L	−0.22	74	IOG-L	0.28
15	ORBinf-R	−0.75	45	SOG-L	−0.19	75	CAL-R	0.29
16	STG-R	−0.74	46	SFGdor-R	−0.17	76	ANG-R	0.30
17	STG-L	−0.73	47	SFGmed-L	−0.15	77	IOG-R	0.33
18	THA-R	−0.63	48	THA-L	−0.14	78	ORBmid-L	0.35
19	PCUN-L	−0.59	49	PUT-R	−0.14	79	ORBmid-R	0.36
20	ACG-R	−0.57	50	PAL-R	−0.14	80	IFGtriang-R	0.39
21	PCL-L	−0.55	51	CAU-R	−0.12	81	TPOsup-R	0.39
22	TPOsup-L	−0.51	52	MCG-L	−0.11	82	ITG-L	0.43
23	IPL-R	−0.49	53	SFGmed-R	−0.07	83	ITG-R	0.50
24	HES-L	−0.48	54	IFGtriang-L	−0.06	84	PCG-L	0.50
25	PCL-R	−0.46	55	IPL-L	−0.03	85	REC-L	0.53
26	HIP-L	−0.43	56	CAU-L	−0.01	86	REC-R	0.53
27	ACG-L	−0.43	57	MFG-R	0.00	87	PCG-R	0.59
28	ORBinf-L	−0.42	58	ORBmed-R	0.01	88	TPOmid-L	0.68
29	PCUN-R	−0.40	59	CUN-R	0.01	89	ANG-L	0.72
30	AMYG-R	−0.39	60	ORBmed-L	0.03	90	TPOmid-R	0.88

Nodes are arranged from nodes that caused the greatest reduction in global efficiency.