Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 5;25(4):383–390. doi: 10.18865/ed.25.4.383

Table 2. Logistic regression analysis for the association of PPARα L162V, PPARγ2 C161T and PPARδ T294C genotypes/alleles with anthropometric-clinical classesa.

Genotypes and allele Obesity Met-S Obese with Met-S
OR Pb 95% CI OR Pb 95% CI OR Pb 95% CI
PPARα L162V
L162V .977 .942 .519, 1.838 .944 .897 .396, 2.250 1.732 .507 .342, 8.774
V162 1.021 .945 . 559, 1.867 .950 .903 .417, 2.163 1.647 .530 .348, 7.804
PPARγ2 C161T
C161T/T161T .783 .303 .491, 1.248 .625 .165 .322, 1.214 .775 .638 .269, 2.239
T161 .845 .391 .574, 1.243 .693 .178 .407, 1.182 .764 .534 .327 , 1.785
PPARδ T294C
T294C/C294C .714 .155 .448, 1.136 1.109 .761 .571, 2.153 1.120 .834 .387, 3.244
C294 .850 .369 .596, 1.211 1.008 .976 .607, 1.672 .910 .816 .409, 2.022

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a. The wild-type genotypes and alleles were set as reference or OR 1.0. Genotypes for PPARγ2 and PPARδ were combined for analysis.

b.Adjusted for age, sex and ethnicity.