Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 1;65(5):411–419. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.65.411

Table 2.

Location and genetic effects of QTL for seed storability in Nanjing35/N22//Nanjing35 BILs and USSR5/N22 RILs after aging treatments

Population Aging treatmentsa QTL nameb Chromosome Marker interval LOD scorec PVE (%)d Additive effect
BIL B-A-10 qSSnj-2-1 2 RM324-RM262 4.1 12.3 −9.3
qSSn-2-2 2 RM526-RM240 3.8 11.4 8.8
qSSn-9 9 RM7038-RM105 3.7 12.2 10.4
B-N-09 qSSn-5 5 RM421-RM26 5.3 15.0 9.0
B-C-09 qSSn-5 5 RM421-RM26 5.5 14.4 10.4
qSSn-6 6 RM588-RM217 4.1 13.6 9.5
qSSn-9 9 RM444-RM105 4.3 13.1 10.2
RIL R-A-12 qSSn-1-1 1 RM443-RM128 3.6 10.8 7.9
qSSn-9 9 RM1328-RM105 4.9 11.1 7.9
R-N-09 qSSn-1 1 RM237-RM128 4.9 11.3 9.8
qSSn-9 9 RM1328-RM105 6.8 13.7 10.1
R-C-11 qSSn-1-1 1 RM443-RM128 4.2 9.9 8.4
qSSn-1-2 1 RM237 3.1 7.3 7.4
qSSn-9 9 RM1328-RM105 10.2 21.5 12.0
a

Aging treatments: ‘B’ and ‘R’ indicate BIL and RIL population, respectively. ‘A’, ‘N’, and ‘C’ denote artificial, natural, and combined aging treatment, respectively, ‘09’, ‘10’, ‘11’, and ‘12’ indicate 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively.

b

QTL name: the letter ‘q’ stands for QTL and ‘SS’ for seed storability; the letter ‘n’ and ‘nj’ for rice cultivar N22 and Nanjing35, respectively; the first number denotes the chromosomal location; the second number denotes different QTL located on the same chromosome.

c

LOD score: logarithm of odds.

d

PVE (%): percentage of total phenotypic variance explained by the QTL.