Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec;6(6):594–604. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.082

Table 5. Summary of published radiographic response rates following radioembolization (RE) in liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Study Design Microsphere Combination therapy vs. comparator Liver-only or liver-dominant Number evaluated for response Response criteria Response (%) Median survival (months)
type CR PR SD DCR PD
First-line
    Kosmider (10) Retrospective Resin + FOLFOX4 (63%) or 5FU/LV (37%) LD 19 RECIST 1.0 11 74 5 89 11 29.4
LO subset 14 11 79 5 95 5 37.8
    Sharma (8) Prospective Resin + FOLFOX LD 20 RECIST 1.0 0 90 10 100 0 NA
    van Hazel (9) Prospective RCT Resin + 5FU/LV LD 11 RECIST 1.0 0 73 27 100 0 29.4
vs. 5FU/LV LD 10 RECIST 1.0 0 0 60 60 40 12.8
    Gray (24) Prospective RCT Resin + FUDR-HAC LO 32 WHO 6 44 41 91 9 39% at 2 y
vs. FUDR-HAC LO 27 WHO 0 22 48 70 30 29% at 2 y
Second-line or third-line
    Van Hazel (7) Prospective Resin + irinotecan LD 23 RECIST 1.0 0 48 39 87 13 12.2
    Lim (11) Retrospective Resin + 5FU in 70% LD 32 RECIST 1.0 0 31 28 59 41 NA
Chemotherapy refractory disease
    Kalva (30) Retrospective Resin None LD 41 RECIST 1.1 0 2 83 85 15 6.1
    Saxena (31) Retrospective Resin None LD 293 RECIST 1.0 1 38 33 72 29 10.5
    Sofocleous (32) Prospective Resin None LD 19 RECIST 1.0 0 5 53 58 42 14.9
PERCIST 0 33 20 53 47
    Benson (33) Prospective Glass None LD 58 RECIST 1.0-based 0 5 53 59 41 8.8
    Smits (34) Retrospective Resin None LD 59 RECIST 1.1TL 3 5 27 35 27 8.9
    Seidensticker (35) Prospective Resin + BSC LD 28 RECIST 1.0 0 43 18 62 38 8.3
Retrospective vs. BSC (matched-pairs) LD NA (of 29) NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.5
    Martin (36) Retrospective Not defined None LD 24 RECIST 1.1 0 0 NA NA NA 8.9
    Zerizer (37) Retrospective Resin + FOLFOX in 20% LD 25 RECIST 1.1TL 0 8 92 100 0 NA
EORTC PET 0 60 40 60 0
Choi 0 8 84 92 8
    Nace (38) Retrospective Resin + FUDR HAC in 33% LD 31 RECIST 1.0 0 13 65 77 23 10.2
    Cosimelli (5) Prospective Resin None LD 46 RECIST 1.0 2 24 26 52 48 12.6
    Hendlisz (6) Prospective RCT Resin + 5FU LO 20 RECIST 1.0 0 10 80 90 10 10
vs. 5FU (> SIRT at PD) LO 22 RECIST 1.0 0 0 36 36 64 7.3
    Cianni (39) Retrospective Resin None LD 41 RECIST 1.0 5 40 36 81 19 11.9
    Jakobs (40) Retrospective Resin None LD 36 RECIST 1.0 0 19 70 89 11 10.5
    Kennedy (17) Retrospective Resin None LD 208 WHO 0 36 55 91 10 10.5R; 4.5NON-R
Mixed setting (first-line through chemotherapy refractory disease)
    Chua (41) Retrospective Resin None LD 140 RECIST 1.0 1 31 31 63 37 9
    Mulcahy (42) Prospective Glass None LD 72 WHO 0 40 45 85 15 14.5
    Stubbs (43) Retrospective Resin + HAC with 5FU LD 80 Author-defined 1 73 20 94 6 11
    Lewandowski (44) Prospective Glass None LD 26 WHO 0 35 52 87 13 9.3

LO, liver-only metastases; LD, liver-dominant metastases; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; DCR, disease control rate (CR + PR + SD); PD, progressive disease; RCT, randomized controlled trial; FUDR-HAC, floxuridine-hepatic arterial chemotherapy; NA, not available; BSC, best supportive care; TL, response in target lesions; R, (survival in) responders; NON-R, (survival in) non-responders; y, years; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.