Table 3. Evidence summary: Do closed suction wound drains decrease the incidence of postoperative complications?
Outcome | Overall quality of evidence | Studies | Effect size |
---|---|---|---|
Range of upper bound of 95% confidence intervala | |||
Hematoma | Low due to risk of bias and imprecision | 3 RCTs (n = 333) | Drain: 2.9–13.6% No drain: 3.1–16.7% |
2 retro cohorts (n = 962) | Drain: 1.1–1.6% No drain: 1.1–2.6% |
||
Superficial wound infection | Insufficient due to risk of bias and imprecision | 2 RCTs (n = 283) | Drain: 4.6–7.1% No drain: 3.0–7.3% |
2 retro cohorts (n = 962) | Drain: 1.0–5.7% No drain: 1.1–5.4% |
||
Deep infection | Insufficient due to risk of bias and imprecision | 1 RCT (n = 83) | Drain: 7.1% No drain: 7.3% |
1 retro cohort (n = 560) | Drain: 1.0% No drain: 1.1% |
||
Postoperative blood transfusion | Insufficient due to risk of bias | 1 retro cohort (n = 402) | Drain: 28.8% No drain: 11.4% RR: 3.5 (1.7, 7.0) |
Abbreviations: RCT, randomized controlled trial; retro, retrospective cohort; RR, risk ratio.
Calculated using Hanley's rule of three when zero events are reported for a given outcome.