Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec;5(6):479–485. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1566288

Table 3. Evidence summary: Do closed suction wound drains decrease the incidence of postoperative complications?

Outcome Overall quality of evidence Studies Effect size
Range of upper bound of 95% confidence intervala
Hematoma Low due to risk of bias and imprecision 3 RCTs (n = 333) Drain: 2.9–13.6%
No drain: 3.1–16.7%
2 retro cohorts (n = 962) Drain: 1.1–1.6%
No drain: 1.1–2.6%
Superficial wound infection Insufficient due to risk of bias and imprecision 2 RCTs (n = 283) Drain: 4.6–7.1%
No drain: 3.0–7.3%
2 retro cohorts (n = 962) Drain: 1.0–5.7%
No drain: 1.1–5.4%
Deep infection Insufficient due to risk of bias and imprecision 1 RCT (n = 83) Drain: 7.1%
No drain: 7.3%
1 retro cohort (n = 560) Drain: 1.0%
No drain: 1.1%
Postoperative blood transfusion Insufficient due to risk of bias 1 retro cohort (n = 402) Drain: 28.8%
No drain: 11.4%
RR: 3.5 (1.7, 7.0)

Abbreviations: RCT, randomized controlled trial; retro, retrospective cohort; RR, risk ratio.

a

Calculated using Hanley's rule of three when zero events are reported for a given outcome.