Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 3;36(11):8559–8571. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3616-7

Table 3.

Associations between MT2A SNPs and inverted papilloma risk

SNP genotype Cases (%)/controls (%) OR (95 % CI)a p OR (95 % CI)b p
rs28366003
 AA 98 (75.4)/401 (95.9) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 AG 31 (23.8)/17 (4.1) 7.46 (3.84–14.47) <0.001 7.43 (3.91–14.46) <0.001
 GG 1 (0.8)/0 (0.0)
p trendc <0.0001
 AG or GG vs. AAd 32 (24.6)/17 (4.1) 7.70 (3.97–14.91) <0.001 7.71 (4.01–14.91) <0.001
 AG or AA vs. GGe 129 (99.2)/418 (100.0)
rs1610216
 AA 96 (73.8)/309 (73.9) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 AG 33 (25.4)/106 (25.3) 1.00 (0.64–1.58) 0.99 1.01 (0.66–1.58) 0.99
 GG 1 (0.8)/3 (0.8) 1.07 (0.11–10.46) 0.95 1.07 (0.10–10.44) 0.94
p trendc 0.97
 AG or GG vs. AAd 34 (26.1)/109 (26.1) 1.00 (0.64–1.57) 0.99 0.99 (0.61–1.56) 0.99
 AG or AA vs. GGe 129 (99.2)/415 (99.3) 1.07 (0.11–10.42) 0.95 1.07 (0.13–10.42) 0.95
rs10636
 GG 58 (44.6)/213 (50.9) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 GC 56 (43.1)/172 (41.2) 1.19 (0.78–1.82) 0.40 1.23 (0.72–1.82) 0.40
 CC 16 (12.3)/33 (7.90) 1.78 (0.91–3.47) 0.09 1.78 (0.94–3.47) 0.09
p trendc 0.1
GC or CC vs. GGd 72 (55.4)/205 (49.0) 1.29 (0.87–1.92) 0.21 1.30 (0.87–1.95) 0.22
GC or GG vs. CCe 114 (87.7)/385 (92.1) 1.64 (0.87–3.09) 0.12 1.65 (0.83–3.10) 0.13

aCrude

bAdjusted for age, gender, family history and smoking status

cTesting additive genetic model (Cochran-Armitage test for trend)

dTesting dominant genetic model

eTesting recessive genetic model