Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 3;36(11):8559–8571. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3616-7

Table 6.

Associations between clinicopathological characteristics and papilloma inverted risk

Variable SNP rs28366003 OR (95 % CI)a p OR (95 % CI)b p
AA n (%) AG or GG n (%)
Stage (Krouse system) pT1 vs. pT2–T4 39 (30.0)/59 (45.4) 1 (0.8)/31 (23.8) 20.49 (2.34–179.64) <0.0001 19.32 (2.30–173.53) <0.0001
Histological type exo vs. endophytic 11 (8.5)/87 (66.9) 2 (1.5)/30 (23.1) 1.89 (0.39–9.14) 0.41 1.87 (0.40–9.14) 0.42
Anatomical areac NS/M/EA vs. EP/F/S 81 (62.3)/17 (13.1) 22 (16.9)/10 (7.7) 2.16 (0.86–5.47) 0.09 2.15 (0.86–5.39) 0.08
Anatomical sites 1 region vs. more 55 (42.3)/43 (33.1) 7 (5.4)/25 (19.2) 4.57 (1.72–12.11) 0.0008 4.58 (1.70–12.11) 0.0008
Dysplasia no vs. yes (mild/severe) 76 (58.5)/22 (16.9) 12 (9.2)/20 (15.4) 2.13 (0.92–4.90) 0.07 2.14 (0.97–4.91) 0.07
Bone destruction no vs. yes 85 (65.4)/9 (6.9) 25 (19.2)/11 (8.5) 4.15 (1.49–11.60) 0.003 4.13 (1.50–11.60) 0.003
Recurrences no vs. yes 90 (69.2)/8 (6.2) 22 (16.9)/10 (7.7) 5.11 (1.71–15.21) 0.001 5.11 (1.68–15.20) 0.001

aCrude, AA vs. AG or GG MT2A SNP rs28366003 (the homozygote of the common allele were estimated as the reference group)

bAdjusted for age, gender, family history and smoking status

cIn NS/M/EA cases only nasal cavity, maxillary sinuses and/or ethmoid anterior sinuses were occupied; In EP/F/S cases besides nasal cavity, maxillary sinuses and/or ethmoid anterior sinuses the other anatomical sites such as ethmoid posterior sinuses, frontal sinuses and/or sphenoid sinuses were occupied simultaneously (NC nasal cavity, M maxillary sinuses, EA ethmoid anterior sinuses, EP ethmoid posterior sinuses, F frontal sinuses, S sphenoid sinuses)