Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 8;9:654. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00654

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Post-stimulation change in rating scores of beauty and ugliness. The beauty rating in the mPFC cathodal significantly decreased compared to those in the sham and the mPFC anodal (left panel). Anodal or cathodal stimulation of the mPFC did not change ugliness rating score (right panel). Error bars represent standard errors (SEs) of the mean. Asterisks indicate the results of multiple comparisons (p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01).