Table 4.

Repellent activity of EOs on 10th-instar T. molitor

EO	Repellence index after 12 h treatment (%) (±SE)			Repellence index after 24 h treatment (%) (± SE)			Repellence index after 48 h treatment (%) (± SE)
	300a	600	900	300	600	900	300	600	900
C. limonum	71.9 ± 0.1 bb	77.7 ± 4.0 b	89.9 ± 1.9 a	62.2 ± 3.0 b	68.3 ± 4.2 b	83.3 ± 1.9 a	53.7 ± 2.2 a	63.9 ± 3.6 b	75.0 ± 2.9 a
Cy. citratus	41.8 ± 2.9 c	51.4 ± 2.9 c	63.1 ± 3.9 b	35.1 ± 4.5 c	44.5 ± 2.2 c	55.0 ± 3.5 b	28.4 ± 4.5 b	37.1 ± 2.0 c	45.7 ± 2.8 b
L. cubeba	83.1 ± 1.8 a	90.0 ± 1.9 a	95.1 ± 1.0 a	73.5 ± 2.1 a	80.6 ± 0.6 a	88.5 ± 1.0 a	59.4 ± 5.3 a	71.2 ± 1.1 a	77.3 ± 3.7 a
M. fragrans	37.7 ± 1.2 c	51.7 ± 2.5 c	59.1 ± 3.0 b	31.6 ± 1.0 c	41.8 ± 1.8 c	47.6 ± 2.8 c	24.3 ± 3.0 b	33.7 ± 2.3 c	41.33 ± 1.3 b
Control	0 d	0 d	0 c	0 d	0 d	0 d	0 c	0 d	0 c
F4,10	110.9	173.5	252.0	120.4	183.2	255.8	46.5	171.0	156.2
P	<0.0001	<0.0001	<0.0001	<0.0001	<0.0001	<0.0001	<0.0001	<0.0001	<0.0001

^a µg/cm² filter paper.

^b Means within a column followed by the different letter differ significantly (P < 0.05) according to analysis of variance (ANOVA). The number of insects tested for each treatment was 90.