Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 7;12:149. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0312-3

Table 1.

Odds Ratios of Cues (Within-Participants), Power of Food Scale Scores (Between-Participants) and Interactions Predicting Snacking (Reference Category = Random Prompts)

Odds ratios (95 % CI) of internal and external cues (Covariates)
Negative affect Arousal Activities Food available Others eat Company
Fixed effects Intercept 0.25 (0.22,0.28)*** 0.25 (0.22,0.28)*** 0.24 (0.21,0.28)*** 0.22 (0.19,0.25)*** 0.23 (0.20,0.27)*** 0.24 (0.22,0.27)***
PFS*Intercept 1.01 (1.00,1.02)*** 1.01 (1.00,1.02)** 1.01 (1.00,1.02)** 1.02 (1.01,1.03)** 1.02 (1.01,1.03)** 1.01 (1.00,1.02)*
Slope Cue 1.11 (0.94,1.31) 1.03 (0.87,1.22) 0.52 (0.36,0.76)*** 5.23 (3.45,7.95)*** 4.06 (3.21,5.13)*** 0.66 (0.50,0.88)**
PFS*Slope Cue 1.01 (1.00,1.02)* 1.01 (1.00,1.02)* 1.03 (1.00,1.06)* 0.99 (0.96,1.02) 0.97 (0.96,0.99)** 0.98 (0.97,1.00)
Random effects (Residual variances) Intercept 0.08** 0.08** 0.07* 0.11** 0.10** 0.08**
Slope Cue 0.002 0.04 0.72** 0.63* 0.02 0.17

Note. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001