Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Sch Health. 2014 Feb;84(2):71–81. doi: 10.1111/josh.12126

Table 4.

Qualitative Analysis: Advocacy and Government Representatives Cited for Position on HPV Vaccine Mandate

Newspaper Sources: Advocacy Groups Position on Vaccine Mandate
(number of mentions if >1)
The Washington
Post
Parents and Citizens Committee to Stop Medial
Experimentation in D.C.
Against

Parents United for D.C. Public Schools Against

National Vaccine Information Center Against (2)

Child Health Advocacy Institution at
Children’s Hospital
Against

Focus on the Family Against

The Balm In Gilead Inc. For (2)

Maryland State Medical Society For

Women In Government Funded by Merck (2)

Maryland State Teachers Association No Stance

The Houston
Chronicle
Texas Eagle Forum Against

Public Citizen Against

Texas Physician Resource Council Against

Parents Requesting Open Vaccine Education Against

Texas Medical Association Against

Women in Government Funded by Merck

The Virginian
Pilot
National Vaccine Information Center Against

Family Foundation No stance

Sources: State Government Representatives

The Washington
Post
D.C. Council Member Against 3
For 7

VA Governor For 1

MD Senate Delegate For 5

KT House Representative For 1

The Houston
Chronicle
TX Governor For 1

TX Lieutenant Governor Against 1

TX Senator Against 4
For 2

TX House Representative Against 12
For 4

TX former government representative For 1

Richmond Times
Dispatch & The
Virginian Pilot
VA Governor Undecided 1
For 1

VA Senate Delegate Against 2
For 6