Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 4;1(11):e1501057. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501057

Table 2. Summary of performance comparison between autocorrelation and FAST for several metrics.

The numbers for metrics 3 to 5 should sum to the number in metric 1.

Metric Autocorrelation FAST
1. Total number of detected events 86 89
2. Number of false detections (false positives) 0 12
3. Number and percentage of catalog detections 24/24 = 100% 21/24 = 87.5%
4. Number of new detections from both algorithms 43 43
5. Number of new detections from one, missed by the other 19 25
6. Number of missed detections (false negatives) 25 22
7. Runtime 9 days 13 hours 1 hour 36 min