Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Mar 15;91(4):721–729. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.12.023

Table 3.

Correlation of Baseline SUV Values with Treatment Outcomes

Variable Endpoint Events/total Hazard ratio (95% CI) p-value
Primary SUVmax (> vs. ≤ median) Local relapse 0/34 vs. 8/34 Cannot estimate
Local-regional relapse 4/34 vs. 12/34 0.31 (0.10, 0.97) 0.04
Distant metastasis 2/34 vs. 6/34 0.32 (0.06, 1.57) 0.16
Progression-free survival 6/34 vs. 18/34 0.30 (0.12, 0.75) 0.01
Overall survival 4/34 vs. 11/34 0.38 (0.12, 1.20) 0.10
Nodal SUVmax (> vs. ≤ median) Regional relapse 6/32 vs. 7/33 0.89 (0.30, 2.66) 0.84
Local-regional relapse 6/32 vs. 9/33 0.72 (0.26, 2.05) 0.54
Distant metastasis 2/32 vs. 5/33 0.40 (0.08, 2.05) 0.27
Progression-free survival 8/32 vs. 15/33 0.56 (0.24, 1.33) 0.19
Overall survival 4/32 vs. 10/33 0.44 (0.14, 1.39) 0.16
Primary SUVpeak (> vs. ≤ median) Local relapse 1/34 vs. 7/34 0.15 (0.02, 1.23) 0.08
Local-regional relapse 6/34 vs. 10/34 0.60 (0.22, 1.65) 0.32
Distant metastasis 3/34 vs. 5/34 0.62 (0.15, 2.62) 0.52
Progression-free survival 9/34 vs. 15/34 0.62 (0.27, 1.42) 0.25
Overall survival 5/34 vs. 10/34 0.55 (0.19, 1.62) 0.28
Nodal SUVpeak (> vs. ≤ median) Regional relapse 6/32 vs. 7/33 0.93 (0.31, 2.77) 0.90
Local-regional relapse 6/32 vs. 9/33 0.75 (0.27, 2.13) 0.59
Distant metastasis 3/32 vs. 4/33 0.81 (0.18, 3.63) 0.79
Progression-free survival 9/32 vs. 14/33 0.74 (0.32, 1.72) 0.49
Overall survival 5/32 vs. 9/33 0.61 (0.20, 1.82) 0.37

CI = confidence interval.

Hazard ratios estimated from Cox models.