Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 6;47(11):e193. doi: 10.1038/emm.2015.79

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival in various gastric cancer patient subgroups, according to CPCC.

      Univariate
Multivariatea
Subgroup Group N HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Male Group 1 (⩽6) 107 1   1  
  Group 2 (7–17) 103 0.95 (0.60–1.51) 0.835 0.71 (0.42–1.21) 0.206
  Group 3 (⩾18) 91 1.45 (0.93–2.25) 0.097 1.09 (0.66–1.83) 0.715
T1 or T2 male Group 1 (⩽6) 62 1   1  
  Group 2 (7–17) 50 0.55 (0.17–1.77) 0.315 1.42 (0.38–5.33) 0.602
  Group 3 (⩾18) 46 2.36 (1.02–5.46) 0.045 3.05 (1.06–8.76) 0.039
T3 or T4 male Group 1 (⩽6) 45 1   1  
  Group 2 (7–17) 53 0.83 (0.50–1.37) 0.461 0.75 (0.40–1.43) 0.386
  Group 3 (⩾18) 45 1.05 (0.62–1.77) 0.854 0.88 (0.46–1.66) 0.684
Female Group 1 (⩽4) 50 1   1  
  Group 2 (5–13) 42 1.03 (0.50–2.14) 0.935 1.68 (0.59–4.81) 0.333
  Group 3 (⩾14) 44 0.75 (0.35–1.62) 0.467 0.88 (0.36–2.14) 0.773

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CPCC, chromatin CKAP2 (cytoskeleton-associated protein 2)-positive cell count; HR, hazard regression.

a

Multivariate analysis with a Cox proportional hazard regression model was used with the co-variables of age, T stage, N stage, histology, tumor location, tumor size, and adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients included in the univariate analysis were also included in the multivariate analysis.

Significant values are shown in bold.