Table 4 .
Model 1—Inferential statistics for mean EBA
Mean |
Mean vs. rifafour |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | Treatment | n | Estimate | 95% BCI | Estimate | 95% BCI |
EBA(0–14) | J (N=15) | 15 | 0.074 | [0.010; 0.145] | −0.073 | [−0.185; 0.042] |
J-Z (N=15) | 15 | 0.133 | [0.065; 0.204] | −0.013 | [−0.128; 0.101] | |
J-Pa (N = 15) | 15 | 0.101 | [0.056; 0.146] | −0.045 | [−0.147; 0.055] | |
Pa-Z (N = 15) | 15 | 0.154 | [0.100; 0.207] | 0.007 | [−0.098; 0.113] | |
Pa-Z-M (N = 15) | 15 | 0.248 | [0.087; 0.430] | 0.102 | [−0.082; 0.304] | |
Rifafour (N = 10) | 10 | 0.146 | [0.055; 0.238] | |||
EBA(0–2) | J (N = 15) | 15 | −0.002 | [−0.086; 0.084] | −0.156 | [−0.316; 0.000] |
J-Z (N = 15) | 15 | 0.069 | [−0.038; 0.170] | −0.085 | [−0.254; 0.081] | |
J-Pa (N = 15) | 15 | 0.105 | [0.019; 0.187] | −0.049 | [−0.210; 0.105] | |
Pa-Z (N = 15) | 15 | 0.179 | [0.079; 0.277] | 0.025 | [−0.142; 0.187] | |
Pa-Z-M (N = 15) | 15 | 0.313 | [0.164; 0.460] | 0.159 | [−0.040; 0.355] | |
Rifafour (N = 10) | 10 | 0.154 | [0.021; 0.290] | |||
EBA(2 -14) | J (N = 15) | 15 | 0.086 | [0.019; 0.170] | −0.059 | [−0.185; 0.075] |
J-Z (N = 15) | 15 | 0.144 | [0.066; 0.229] | −0.001 | [−0.132; 0.133] | |
J-Pa (N = 15) | 15 | 0.100 | [0.053; 0.148] | −0.044 | [−0.160; 0.072] | |
Pa-Z (N = 15) | 15 | 0.149 | [0.093; 0.203] | 0.004 | [−0.114; 0.124] | |
Pa-Z-M (N = 15) | 15 | 0.238 | [0.046; 0.455] | 0.093 | [−0.124; 0.330] | |
Rifafour (N = 10) | 10 | 0.145 | [0.037; 0.251] |
Notes. Treatment group: J = TMC207, J-Z = TMC207 + Pyrazinamide, J-Pa = TMC207 + PA-824, Pa-Z = PA-824 + Pyrazinamide, Pa-Z-M = PA-824 + Pyrazinamide + Moxifloxacin, Rifafour = Rifafour e-275®. EBA: early bactericidal activity over Day
to Day
; BCI: Bayesian credibility interval; n = number of patients in each category.