Table 3.

Interrelations between walking and cycling domains and relations with other types of physical activity

	Walking			Cycling
	Commutinga	Leisure	Errands	Commutinga	Leisure	Errands
	OR (95 % CI)	OR (95 % CI)	OR (95 % CI)	OR (95 % CI)	OR (95 % CI)	OR (95 % CI)
Individual and socio-demographic
Leisure-time physical activity
<1 h per week	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
1 h–2 h30 per week	0.96 (0.89–1.03)	1.23 (1.16–1.30)	1.11 (1.05–1.17)	1.26 (1.10–1.45)	1.54 (1.39–1.71)	1.51 (1.34–1.70)
>2 h30 per week	0.89 (0.82–0.96)	1.53 (1.44–1.62)	1.14 (1.08–1.21)	1.49 (1.28–1.72)	1.80 (1.62–2.00)	1.88 (1.66–2.12)
Domestic activities
<7 h per week	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
≥7 h per week	0.98 (0.92–1.05)	1.29 (1.23–1.35)	1.15 (1.09–1.20)	0.88 (0.79–0.99)	1.07 (0.99–1.16)	0.93 (0.85–1.02)
Walking
Commuting
No	NR	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
Yes	NR	1.12 (1.06–1.20)	2.37 (2.23–2.53)	1.02 (0.89–1.17)	0.82 (0.73–0.93)	0.72 (0.64–0.82)
Leisure
No	Ref	NR	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
Yes	1.15 (1.08–1.23)	NR	2.02 (1.93–2.12)	0.81 (0.71–0.91)	1.98 (1.83–2.14)	0.66 (0.60–0.73)
Errands
No	Ref	Ref	NR	Ref	Ref	Ref
Yes	2.41 (2.26–2.57)	2.02 (1.96–2.12)	NR	0.72 (0.64–0.81)	0.77 (0.71–0.84)	3.12 (2.85–3.43)
Cycling
Commuting
No	Ref	Ref	Ref	NR	Ref	Ref
Yes	1.01 (0.88–1.16)	0.83 (0.74–0.93)	0.65 (0.61–0.76)	NR	1.58 (1.38–1.80)	16.09 (14.23–18.19)
Leisure
No	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref	NR	Ref
Yes	0.81 (0.72–0.91)	1.94 (1.80–2.10)	0.78 (0.72–0.84)	2.06 (1.79–2.37)	NR	10.89 (9.89–11.98)
Errands
No	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref	NR
Yes	0.76 (0.66–0.86)	0.65 (0.59–0.71)	2.97 (2.71–3.25)	14.77 (13.09–16.68)	10.69 (9.71–11.77)	NR

Models were adjusted for age, income, health perception, smoking status, leisure screen-time, city density population. Models with commuting as outcome were additionally adjusted on distance to work and time spent at work. Models with leisure and errands as outcome were additionally adjusted on working status. NR: not relevant

^aAnalyses were performed among workers only