Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 9;16:204. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0204-4

Table 3.

Prevalence ratios of poor glycemic control (HbA1c >7 % vs. ≤7 %) by diabetes type

Determinants Type 1a P-value Type 2b P-value
Age (years)c
 Tertile 1 1 1
 Tertile 2 1.31 (0.95, 1.80) 0.10 0.78 (0.72, 0.84) <0.001
 Tertile 3 1.04 (0.76, 1.70) 0.81 0.57 (0.52, 0.62) <0.001
Male sex 0.94 (0.71, 1.24) 0.67 1.08 (1.00, 1.16) 0.05
Race/ethnicityd
 Native American 1.03 (0.52, 2.05) 0.93 1.47 (1.20, 1.79) <0.001
 Asian 0.48 (0.11, 2.05) 0.32 1.00 (0.80, 1.25) 0.99
 Black 0.82 (0.58, 1.16) 0.27 1.04 (0.95, 1.14) 0.44
 Pacific Islander 0.78 (0.18, 3.42) 0.75 0.95 (0.61, 1.48) 0.82
 Other/Multiracial 0.41 (0.05, 3.07) 0.38 0.79 (0.38, 1.67) 0.53
Hispanic ethnicity 0.75 (0.51, 1.11) 0.15 1.18 (1.06, 1.31) 0.002
Median rent ($)
  ≤ 735 1 1
 736–959 0.79 (0.57, 1.08) 0.14 0.94 (0.86, 1.03) 0.18
  ≥ 960 0.81 (0.53, 1.23) 0.33 0.99 (0.89, 1.10) 0.87
Median household income ($)
  < 38,629 1 1
 38,630–52,301 1.17 (0.79, 1.75) 0.43 1.07 (0.97, 1.19) 0.19
  > 52,303 1.02 (0.60, 1.81) 0.94 1.11 (0.97, 1.27) 0.14
% below poverty
  < 12 1 1
 12–21 0.86 (0.56, 1.32) 0.49 1.07 (0.96, 1.20) 0.22
  ≥ 21 0.86 (0.49, 1.53) 0.61 1.10 (0.94, 1.29) 0.22
% unemployed
  < 5 1 1
 5–7 0.97 (0.68, 1.38) 0.86 1.04 (0.95, 1.13) 0.42
  > 7 1.16 (0.79, 1.69) 0.45 1.05 (0.95, 1.16) 0.30
% with < high school education
  < 11.5 1 1
 11.5–19.5 0.83 (0.57, 1.21) 0.33 0.96 (0.87, 1.07) 0.45
  ≥ 19.5 0.94 (0.67, 1.46) 0.80 0.98 (0.87, 1.11) 0.80
Smoking (current) 1.06 (0.69, 1.61) 0.80 0.97 (0.83, 1.12) 0.67
BMI (kg/m2)
 19- < 25 1 1
 25–29 1.23 (0.88, 1.72) 0.28 1.03 (0.93, 1.14) 0.60
  ≥ 30 0.86 (0.62, 1.21) 0.39 1.14 (1.04, 1.26) 0.008
Platelet count (×103/μL)
  ≤ 207 1 1
 208–277 1.68 (1.03. 2.74) 0.04 1.08 (0.99, 1.18) 0.08
  ≥ 278 2.28 (1.42, 3.63) <0.001 1.10 (1.01, 1.21) 0.04
White blood cell count (1000 per μL)
  < 6.3 1 1
 6.3–8.2 1.01 (0.71, 1.45) 0.94 1.11 (1.02, 1.22) 0.02
  > 8.2 0.97 (0.70, 1.38) 0.86 1.19 (1.08, 1.31) <0.001
Ferritin (ng/mL)
  < 200 1 1
 200–399 0.90 (0.62, 1.31) 0.59 1.01 (0.93, 1.11) 0.77
  ≥ 400 1.11 (0.80, 1.55) 0.53 1.15 (1.06, 1.26) 0.001
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
  ≤ 200 1 1
 201–239 1.07 (0.74, 1.54) 0.73 1.12 (0.99, 1.26) 0.06
  ≥ 240 1.12 (1.09, 1.61) 0.02 1.17 (1.03, 1.34) 0.01
HDL (mg/dL)
  ≤ 40 1 1
 40–59 0.93 (0.64, 1.34) 0.70 0.82 (0.72, 0.92) <0.001
  ≥ 60 0.72 (0.47, 1.11) 0.14 0.68 (0.60, 0.77) <0.001
Triglycerides (mg/dL)
  ≤ 150 1 1
 150–199 1.23 (0.87, 1.75) 0.25 1.14 (1.04, 1.25) 0.007
  ≥ 200 1.45 (1.03, 2.05) 0.03 1.48 (1.35, 1.62) <0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
  < 120 1 1
 120–139 1.34 (0.74, 2.42) 0.33 1.00 (0.88, 1.15) 0.97
  ≥ 140 1.21 (0.72, 2.05) 0.47 1.12 (0.99, 1.26) 0.07
Albumin (g/dL)
  ≤ 3.5 1 1
 3.6–3.9 0.76 (0.58, 1.03) 0.08 0.94 (0.87, 1.02) 0.15
  ≥ 4.0 0.81 (0.54, 1.22) 0.30 0.76 (0.69, 0.85) <0.001
Normalized protein catabolic rate (g/kg/d)
  < 0.8 1 1
 0.8–1.00 1.18 (0.84, 1.65) 0.33 0.80 (0.73, 0.88) <0.001
  ≥ 1.01 1.09 (0.81, 1.49) 0.57 0.83 (0.77, 0.90) <0.001
eGFR e (mL/min/1.73 m2)
  < 7 1 1
 7–10 1.59 (1.04, 2.43) 0.03 1.14 (1.01, 1.27) 0.03
  ≥ 10 1.66 (1.13, 2.43) 0.009 1.36 (1.23, 1.51) <0.001
Hemoglobin (g/dL)
  < 10 1 1
 10–11 0.95 (0.57, 1.61) 0.86 1.21 (0.98, 1.45) 0.07
  ≥ 11 1.03 (0.68, 1.57) 0.90 1.45 (1.00, 1.70) 0.05

aIn 627 US adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus initiating maintenance hemodialysis at a DaVita outpatient facility. Multivariable model included all demographic, area-level socioeconomic, and clinical and biometric variables

bIn 15,670 US adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiating maintenance hemodialysis at a DaVita outpatient facility. Multivariable model included all demographic, area-level socioeconomic, and clinical and biometric variables

cAge breakdown in tertiles was as follows: 18–31 (tertile 1), 32–36 (tertile 2), 37–39 (tertile 3) for patients with type 1 diabetes, and 40–61 (tertile 1), 62–71 (tertile 2), and >71 (tertile 3) for patients with type 2 diabetes

dCompared with white race as the reference category

eeGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate