Skip to main content
. 2015 Autumn;14(4):1305–1316.

Table 1.

Different parts of extracted criteria for decision-making assessment.

Part Criteria Reference
1-economical 1-economic evaluation guidelines by manufacturer
2-ICER thresholds
3-Budget impact
4-Expected budget increase for third party payer
5-Price in comparison to comparator drug
6-Sales volume of drug
7-Physicians demand
(19,20)
(21-25)
(21,26,27)
(28,29)
(30,31)
(32)
(33)
2- clinical 1-Considered RCT evidence
2-DALY as an endpoint of drug
3-Efficacy as a therapeutic value
4-Availability of treatment alternative
5-Condition is life threatening
6-Target population
7-Ability to reduce own health risk
(19,21,24,28,34,35)
(24,34)
(30,36,37)
(21,24,26,38)
(28,36,38)
(24)
(24)
3-study quality 1-Quality of evidence
2-Quality of economic model
3-Quality of economic evidence review of stakeholder perspectives
4-Degree of uncertainty
5-Consideration of HTA
6-Year of study publication
(27,39)
(24,28,35,40)
(24,28,35,40)
(24,28,35,40)
(26,28,38)
(19,41)
(24)
4-management field 1-rule of rescue
2-Ensure the availability of drugs
3-Place in therapeutic strategy (e.g. 1st or 2nd line treatment)
4-Objective of technology (e.g. prevention)
5-Objective of technology (e.g. treatment)
6-Expert Committee Decision
(42)
(32)
(36)
(24,38)
(24,38)
(43,44)