Table 5.
No. | Statement |
---|---|
1 | ESWT is effective. |
2 | ESWT is safe. |
3 | For certain orthopedic conditions, RCTs on ESWT were the predominant type of RCT listed in the PEDro database and/or obtained the highest PEDro scores among all investigated treatment modalities. |
4 | There was no difference in the ‘quality’ of RCTs on ESWT in PEDro with positive or negative outcome. |
5 | Application of local anesthesia adversely affects outcome of ESWT. |
6 | Application of insufficient energy adversely affects outcome of ESWT. |
7 | There is no scientific evidence in favor of either rESWT or fESWT with respect to treatment outcome. |
8 | The distinction between radial ESWT as ‘low-energy ESWT’ and focused ESWT as ‘high-energy ESWT’ is not correct and should be abandoned. |
9 | There is no scientific evidence that a certain fESWT technology is superior to the other technologies. |
10 | An optimum treatment protocol for ESWT appears to be three treatment sessions at 1-week intervals, with 2000 impulses per session and the highest energy flux density that can be applied. |