Table 3.
The numbers of each type of dog purpose reported by owners from different household types.
Family | More than one adult | Retired | Single adult | Not reported | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Household peta | 1288 | 1231 | 205 | 153 | 64a, c |
Working doga | 84a, c | 132a, d | 21 | 9 | 7 |
Assistance dogb | 8 | 11 | 10b, d | 3 | 1 |
Multi-purposeb | 7 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Show dog | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
Breeding dog | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Otherb | 8 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
Not reporteda | 515a, d | 350a, c | 47a, c | 61 | 51a, d |
Total | 1914 | 1746 | 287 | 235 | 125 |
χ2 tests performed with Bonferroni correction. For example, 84 of 1914 dogs in families were working dogs compared with 169 of 2393 in other household types. Due to low numbers in many categories, only household pet, working dog and purpose not reported categories were assessed for associations.
Fisher’s exact tests performed with Bonferroni correction. For example, 8 of 1914 dogs in families were assistance dogs compared with 25 of 2393 in other household types. Due to very low numbers, show and breeding dog categories were not considered.
Negative association, P < 0.003.
Positive association, P < 0.003.