Table 1. Operationalization of ID Quality.
Factor | Weak | Strong |
---|---|---|
Did the interviewing officer ask the eyewitness about media exposure? | No | Yes |
Was the eyewitness instructed to avoid discussing the crime and avoid the media? | No | Yes |
Did the interviewing officer ask leading questions about the appearance of the perpetrator? | Yes | No |
Did the interviewing officer ask leading questions about the quality of the witness's view of the perpetrator? | Yes | No |
Were standardized identification procedure instructions used? | No | Yes |
How many photos were in the lineup array? | 5 | 8 |
Did the description of the suspect match the appearance of line-up participants? | No | Yes |
Was the interviewing officer unaware of which lineup participant was the suspect? | No | Yes |
Was the witness instructed that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup? | No | Yes |
Did the interviewing officer provide confirmatory feedback immediately after the identification? | Yes | No |
Columns indicate differences in the key witness's testimony across the “weak” and “strong” ID Quality conditions. All other aspects of the evidence were held constant across conditions.