Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Transplant. 2013 Jul 9;13(8):2052–2058. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12301

Table 1. Simulation outputs from LSAM; by allocation scenario.

Four allocation scenarios are compared: the current policy of local-first allocation, fully regional sharing using the current map, and fully regional sharing using the alternative maps designed by redistricting optimization (as shown in Figure 1). Standard errors are shown in parentheses. The last row quantifies geographic disparity as the variance of the median MELD at transplant among all DSAs.

Local-First Current Map Fully Regional Sharing
Current Map Optimized Map 1 Optimized Map 2
Total deaths per year 2727 (10.6) 2680 (4.7) 2651 (9.8) 2650 (6.6)
Waitlist deaths per year 1368 (3.3) 1329 (2.2) 1307 (5.2) 1310 (4.4)
Median MELD at transplant 25 25 26 26
First offers for MELD<25 (%) 14.6% 4.6% 3.3% 3.1%
Transplants for MELD>25, Status 1 (%) 51.9% 57.2% 60.8% 61.2%
Pediatric transplants (%) 6.6% 6.9% 7.0% 7.1%
Transplants allocated locally (%) 74.6% 49.8% 49.6% 48.5%
Median transport distance (miles) 68.5 (0.3) 132 (0.6) 143 (0.4) 142(0.3)
Variance of median MELD at transplant 11.2 13.5 7.0 8.5

Bold font signifies that the given metric is statistically significantly different from that for fully regional sharing with the current map. Only variance of median MELD at transplantation is statistically significantly different between Map 1 and Map 2 (see text). All comparisons between local-first current map and Map 1, and between local-first current map and Map 2, are statistically significant.