Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;50(1):80–84. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000400

Table 1.

Study characteristics and RR with CI for individual studies

No Study
Name		 Year of
publication		 Country Type Male:
Female		 Single
center
Vs
Multi
Center		 N-O
scale* 		Cases
of
CHC		 Genotype Fibrosis
definition		 IR
definition		 Total
RR
(95%
CI)
1 Hui et al 24 2003 AUS Case- control 175:85 Single 7 260 3 and Non 3 Scheuer HOMA 1.3 (1.1– 1.4)
2 Sud et al 34 2004 AUS Cohort 115:61 Multi 6 176 ** Scheuer HOMA 1.47 (1.14– 1.89)
3 Bugi anesi et al25 2006 AUS Cohort 101:31 Single 7 132 3 Scheuer HOMA ≥2.7 2.98 (1.13– 7.89)
4 Baroni et al 33 2007 Italy Cohort 62:28 Multi 7 90 3 and Non 3 Ishak HOMA >2.7 0.36 (0.06– 2.05)
5 Cua et al 21 2008 AUS Cohort 235:111 Single 5 346 1 and 3 Scheuer HOMA>2 3.15 (1.56– 6.35)
6 Chu et al 26 2008 China Cohort ** Single 5 192 ** Metavir HOMA >2.5 2.46 (1.24– 4.9)
7 Petta et al 22 2008 Italy Cohort 105:96 Single 6 201 1 Scheuer HOMA >2.7 2.69 (1.46–4.95)
8 Moucari et al 27 2008 France Cohort 254:200 Single 6 454 1 and 4 Metavir HOMA >3 1.8 (1.16– 2.82)
9 Halfon et al 29 2009 France Cohort 121:49 Single 5 170 ** Metavir HOMA >2 2.44 (1.15–5)
10 Moucari et al 28 2009 France Cohort 168:58 Single 6 226 4 Metavir HOMA>3 3.86 (1.86– 8.03)
11 Hsu et al 30 2010 Taiwan Cohort 288:246 Single 5 528 1 and 2 Metavir HOMA >2.4 1.23 (0.78– 1.95)
12 Patel et al 31 2011 Asia Cohort 141:122 Multi 5 263 2 and 3 Metavir HOMA>2 2.80 (1.4– 5.4)
13 Petta et al 23 2012 Italy Cohort 239:242 Single 5 481 1 Scheuer HOMA>3 1.69 (1.04– 2.73)
14 Ziada et al 32 2013 Egypt Case-control 75:65 Single 6 140 ** HAI HOMA≥2 1.92 (0.97– 3.4)
*

Newcastle-Ottawa Scale