Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Densitom. 2015 Jun 10;19(2):220–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.04.003

Figures 3. a-d: Bland-Altman Plots of Lean and Fat BioClinica Body Composition Phantom Data Before and After Recalibration.

Figures 3

Lean and fat differed between instruments by 4.6% & 7.8% with biases of +463 g & −496 g (3a-b). After recalibration, instrument agreement improved to 2.6% for lean and 4.8% in fat, with biases of +265 g and −298 g respectively (3c-d).