Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 16;107(12):djv257. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv257

Table 2.

Clinical performance of dual stain and Pap cytology for detection of cervical precancer among 1509 HPV-positive women*

Statistical measures p16/Ki-67 dual stain 1+
(95% CI)
Liquid-based cytology ASCUS+ (95% CI) P
Positivity 694 (46.0% [43.5% to 48.5%]) 806 (53.4% [50.9% to 55.9%]) <.001
Detection of CIN2+ (n = 175)
 Sensitivity 83.4% (77.1% to 88.6%) 76.6% (69.6% to 82.6%) .1
 Specificity 58.9% (56.2% to 61.6%) 49.6% (46.9% to 52.3%) <.001
 PPV 21.0% (18.1% to 24.3%) 16.6% (14.1% to 19.4%) <.001
 NPV 96.4% (94.9% to 97.6%) 94.2% (92.2% to 95.8%) .01
 LR+ 2.0 (1.9 to 2.2) 1.5 (1.4 to 1.7)
 LR- 0.3 (0.2 to 0.4) 0.5 (0.4 to 0.6)
 OR 7.2 (4.8 to 11.0) 3.2 (2.2 to 4.6)
Detection of CIN3+ (n = 99)
 Sensitivity 86.9% (78.6% to 92.8%) 83.8% (75.1% to 90.5%) .7
 Specificity 56.9% (54.2% to 59.5%) 48.7% (46.1% to 51.4%) <.001
 PPV 12.4% (10.0% to 15.1%) 10.3% (8.3% to 12.6%) .002
 NPV 98.4% (97.3% to 99.1%) 97.7% (96.3% to 98.7%) .3
 LR+ 2.0 (1.8 to 2.2) 1.6 (1.5 to 1.8)
 LR- 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) 0.3 (0.2 to 0.5)
 OR 8.7 (4.9 to 15.7) 4.9 (2.9 to 8.5)

* P values for positivity, sensitivity, and specificity are based on McNemar’s Chi-square test. P values for positive predictive value and negative predictive value are based on the method developed by Leisenring and Pepe (14). All statistical tests were two-sided. LR+ = likelihood ratio–positive; LR- = likelihood ratio–negative; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value; OR = odds ratio.